Suppr超能文献

慢性缺血性心脏病患者对静态-动态用力与单纯动态用力的心血管反应比较。

Comparison of cardiovascular responses to static-dynamic effort and dynamic effort alone in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease.

作者信息

DeBusk R, Pitts W, Haskell W, Houston N

出版信息

Circulation. 1979 May;59(5):977-84. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.5.977.

Abstract

Thirty men, mean age 55 years, known to have treadmill-induced ischemic ST-segment depression, performed static and dynamic effort, i.e., forearm lifting and treadmill exercise, separately and combined. Static effort was sustained at 20%, 25% or 30% of maximal forearm lifting capacity. Two symptom-limited treadmill tests, one with and one without added static effort, were performed on each of two visits. Compared with dynamic effort alone, combined static-dynamic effort decreased treadmill work load and increased heart rate, systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product at the onset of ischemic ST-segment depression or angina pectoris: 7.1 +/- 0.4 vs 8.0 +/- 0.5 (SEM) multiples of resting oxygen consumption (mets), estimated; 141 +/- 3 vs 134 +/- 3 beats/min; 170 +/- 4 vs. 162 +/- 4 mm Hg and 239 +/- 8 vs 218 +/- 9 (p less than 0.001). The prevalence of angina pectoris was significantly less with combined static-dynamic effort than with dynamic effort alone. Static effort causes a resetting of the threshold at which ischemic abnormalities appear during dynamic effort.

摘要

30名平均年龄55岁、已知有跑步机诱发缺血性ST段压低的男性,分别进行了静态和动态用力,即前臂上举和跑步机运动,以及两者相结合的运动。静态用力维持在前臂最大上举能力的20%、25%或30%。在两次就诊时,对每位受试者分别进行了两次症状限制的跑步机测试,一次有额外的静态用力,一次没有。与单独的动态用力相比,静态-动态联合用力在缺血性ST段压低或心绞痛发作时降低了跑步机工作负荷,提高了心率、收缩压和心率-血压乘积:估计静息耗氧量倍数分别为7.1±0.4和8.0±0.5(SEM);心率分别为141±3次/分钟和134±3次/分钟;收缩压分别为170±4毫米汞柱和162±4毫米汞柱;心率-血压乘积分别为239±8和218±9(p<0.001)。与单独的动态用力相比,静态-动态联合用力时心绞痛的发生率显著降低。静态用力会重置动态用力期间缺血异常出现的阈值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验