Benjamin D R, Ray C G
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jul;28(1):47-51. doi: 10.1128/am.28.1.47-51.1974.
The immunoperoxidase method, using commercially available antisera, was compared with standard virological methods for the identification and typing of 77 isolates of human myxoviruses and paramyxoviruses. Results of typing using neutralization tests and the immunoperoxidase technique were identical for 76 of the 77 isolates. With the immunoperoxidase method there was one false negative reaction, but no false positive reactions. Cross-reactivity between influenza A (soluble) and A(2)/HK antisera with influenza A isolates was noted, but did not interfere with the interpretation of results. It is concluded that the immunoperoxidase method is ideally suited for the rapid identification and typing of common human respiratory viruses on a routine basis. It offers a number of decided advantages over both immunofluorescence and standard virological methods.
使用市售抗血清的免疫过氧化物酶法与标准病毒学方法进行比较,以鉴定和分型77株人黏液病毒和副黏液病毒。在77株分离株中,有76株通过中和试验和免疫过氧化物酶技术进行分型的结果相同。采用免疫过氧化物酶法有1例假阴性反应,但无假阳性反应。注意到甲型流感(可溶性)和A(2)/HK抗血清与甲型流感分离株之间存在交叉反应,但不影响结果的判读。结论是免疫过氧化物酶法非常适合在常规基础上对常见人类呼吸道病毒进行快速鉴定和分型。它比免疫荧光法和标准病毒学方法都具有一些明显的优势。