Back A F, Schmidt N J
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):392-9. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.392-399.1974.
Indirect hemagglutinating (IHA) antibody responses to Herpesvirus hominis types 1 and 2 (HVH-1 and HVH-2) were compared to complement-fixing and neutralizing antibody responses in immunized laboratory animals (rabbits, guinea pigs, and hamsters) and in natural infections of man. With the immunized animals, type specificity was seen only in the IHA test and only with antisera produced in hamsters and in the rabbits immunized with HVH-2. In human nongenital infections (considered to be caused predominately by HVH-1), IHA and neutralizing antibodies developed at about the same rate and reached approximately the same levels for HVH-1 and HVH-2. IHA titers tended to be higher than neutralizing antibody titers for both virus types. In genital infections (considered to be caused predominately by HVH-2), there was a rapid IHA antibody response to HVH-2, and the early HVH-2 antibody demonstrable by IHA, but not by neutralization tests, was found to be immunoglobulin M in nature. In genital infections, IHA titers for HVH-2 were markedly higher than neutralization titers, but there was no pronounced difference in neutralizing the IHA antibody titers for HVH-1. Several patients with genital infections fialed to develop IHA antibody for HVH-1. The IHA test possessed no greater sensitivity than did complement fixation or neutralization tests for serodiagnosis of HVH infections. Despite the fact that a number of patients with genital infections produced IHA antibody only for HVH-2, the test was no more effective than the neutralization test in providing a type-specific serodiagnosis of infection, due largely to the fact that the rapid IHA antibody response to HVH-2 prevented demonstration of a further, significant antibody titer increase in a number of cases.
将免疫实验动物(兔子、豚鼠和仓鼠)以及人类自然感染中针对1型和2型人疱疹病毒(HVH - 1和HVH - 2)的间接血凝(IHA)抗体反应与补体结合和中和抗体反应进行了比较。在免疫动物中,仅在IHA试验中观察到型特异性,且仅在仓鼠以及用HVH - 2免疫的兔子产生的抗血清中出现。在人类非生殖器感染(认为主要由HVH - 1引起)中,IHA和中和抗体以大致相同的速率产生,并且针对HVH - 1和HVH - 2达到大致相同的水平。两种病毒类型的IHA滴度往往高于中和抗体滴度。在生殖器感染(认为主要由HVH - 2引起)中,对HVH - 2有快速的IHA抗体反应,并且通过IHA可检测到但中和试验无法检测到的早期HVH - 2抗体本质上是免疫球蛋白M。在生殖器感染中,HVH - 2的IHA滴度明显高于中和滴度,但在中和HVH - 1的IHA抗体滴度方面没有明显差异。几名生殖器感染患者未能产生针对HVH - 1的IHA抗体。对于HVH感染的血清学诊断,IHA试验的敏感性并不比补体结合试验或中和试验更高。尽管许多生殖器感染患者仅产生针对HVH - 2的IHA抗体,但该试验在提供感染的型特异性血清学诊断方面并不比中和试验更有效,这主要是因为对HVH - 2的快速IHA抗体反应在许多情况下阻止了进一步显著的抗体滴度升高的显示。