James G P, Bee D E
Clin Chem. 1979 Jun;25(6):996-1001.
Two urine dip-stick assays for glucose were studied and compared to a quantitative hexokinase procedure. We determined sensitivity, specificity, predictive value of "normal" and "abnormal" dip stick results, assay efficiency, technologist precision, and method association. Precision was poor. Attempts to estimate urine glucose concentration with the dip sticks frequently produced gross inaccuracies. We believe the dip stick glucose assay should be considered qualitative only; as a qualitative test, the dip sticks are fairly efficient at distinguishing glucose concentrations of less than 0.3 g/L from concentrations greater than 0.3 g/L.
对两种用于检测葡萄糖的尿液试纸法进行了研究,并与定量己糖激酶法进行了比较。我们测定了灵敏度、特异性、试纸检测结果为“正常”和“异常”的预测值、检测效率、技术人员操作的精密度以及方法之间的相关性。精密度较差。用试纸法估算尿液葡萄糖浓度时,常常会产生严重的误差。我们认为,尿液试纸葡萄糖检测法应仅视为定性检测;作为一种定性检测方法,试纸在区分葡萄糖浓度低于0.3g/L和高于0.3g/L方面相当有效。