James G P, Bee D E, Fuller J B
Clin Chem. 1978 Nov;24(11):1934-9.
We studied and compared results of two urine dip-stick procedures for protein with those of quantitative measurements of total protein and albumin in urine. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of "normal" and "abnormal" dip-stick results, assay efficiency, technologist precision, and method association were determined. Precision was poor, attributable largely to variation within each technologist. Relative to a defined measure of precision, technologist performance appears to be uniform within each product. Patients' urinary protein concentrations of less than 200 mg/liter can be distinguished from concentrations greater than 3000 mg/liter with confidence by dip-stick procedures. Urin samples with low albumin/total protein ratios were frequently falsely negative by dip-stick assays.
我们研究并比较了两种尿蛋白试纸检测方法与尿总蛋白和白蛋白定量检测结果。确定了“正常”和“异常”试纸检测结果的敏感性、特异性、预测值、检测效率、技术人员操作精度以及方法关联性。操作精度较差,主要归因于每个技术人员操作的差异。相对于定义的精度标准,每个产品内技术人员的表现似乎较为一致。通过试纸检测程序能够可靠地区分尿蛋白浓度低于200毫克/升和高于3000毫克/升的患者。试纸检测对白蛋白/总蛋白比率低的尿样经常出现假阴性结果。