Bee D E, James G P, Paul K L
Clin Chem. 1979 Oct;25(10):1696-9.
Five methods of assessing blood in urine were studied and compared: sedimentation count, hemacytometry, "Clini-lab" reagent strip and "N-Multistix" and "ChemStrip-8" dipsticks. The minimum sensitivity of two commercially available urine dip-stick procedures for blood was established. The study includes method association, assay variation among and within technologists, accuracy, precision, and sensitivity. Our results demonstrate generally poor association between results by the dip-stick procedures and the hemacytometer or sedimentation count. Results by the last two procedures also showed very poor association with each other.
沉淀计数法、血细胞计数法、“Clini-lab”试剂条法、“N-Multistix”试纸条法和“ChemStrip-8”试纸条法。确定了两种市售尿液试纸条血液检测方法的最低灵敏度。该研究包括方法相关性、技术人员之间和内部的检测差异、准确性、精密度和灵敏度。我们的结果表明,试纸条检测方法与血细胞计数法或沉淀计数法的结果之间通常关联性较差。后两种检测方法的结果相互之间关联性也非常差。