Holloway Y, Dankert J
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1979;245(3):324-31.
The Minitek Miniaturized System (BBL) was compared to a conventional method (V.P.I.) for the indentification of anaerobes. Anaerobiosis was achieved by using the GasPak system (BBL) and a glove box. Gram staining, colonial morphology, gas-liquid chromatography and biochemical reactions as detailed in the Virginia Polytechnic Institute anaerobe laboratory manual were compared to the biochemical results obtained on the Minitek system. A total of 32 anaerobes was used. The percentage of correlation was an overall 98.2%. Discrepancies were found mostly in the production of indole, the reduction of nitrate, and the hydrolysis of aesculin. A further 95 anaerobes were tested on these three reactions, and found to give an overall agreement of 92.9%. It was found necessary to use some additional tests as well as gas-liquid chromatography for definitive identification. The microsystem was also evaluated as to time saved, cost and ease of use.
将Minitek微型系统(BBL)与一种用于鉴定厌氧菌的传统方法(弗吉尼亚理工学院方法)进行了比较。通过使用GasPak系统(BBL)和手套箱实现厌氧环境。将弗吉尼亚理工学院厌氧菌实验室手册中详细描述的革兰氏染色、菌落形态、气液色谱法和生化反应与在Minitek系统上获得的生化结果进行了比较。总共使用了32种厌氧菌。总体相关性百分比为98.2%。差异主要出现在吲哚的产生、硝酸盐的还原以及七叶苷的水解方面。另外对95种厌氧菌进行了这三种反应的测试,发现总体一致性为92.9%。发现有必要使用一些额外的测试以及气液色谱法进行明确鉴定。还对该微型系统在节省时间、成本和易用性方面进行了评估。