Lusk J E, Nelson D L
J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):148-60. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.1.148-160.1972.
The energy-dependent exchange of intracellular Mg(2+) with extracellular Mg(2+) or Co(2+) is inhibited by colicin E1 and, less strongly, by colicin K. Treatment with either colicin causes a net loss of intracellular Mg(2+). This loss begins immediately in cells treated with colicin E1, but in colicin K-treated cells the onset of Mg(2+) loss is delayed 1 to 10 min, depending upon the temperature and the multiplicity of colicin K. Both colicins differ from chemical inhibitors of energy-yielding metabolism; energy poisons block transport of Mg(2+) and Co(2+), but both colicins increase passive permeability to Mg(2+) and Co(2+). Inhibitors of energy-yielding metabolism (and of Mg(2+) exchange) block the initiation of Mg(2+) loss by either colicin, but do not stop colicin-promoted efflux once it has begun. Colicin E1 added before colicin K prevents the more rapid Mg(2+) efflux characteristic of colicin K-treated cells. Quantitative comparisons of the effects of colicins E1 and K upon permeability to Mg(2+) and Co(2+) lead us to conclude that the two colicins are not identical in their mode of action.
细胞内Mg(2+)与细胞外Mg(2+)或Co(2+)之间的能量依赖性交换受到大肠杆菌素E1的抑制,大肠杆菌素K的抑制作用则较弱。用任何一种大肠杆菌素处理都会导致细胞内Mg(2+)的净损失。在用大肠杆菌素E1处理的细胞中,这种损失立即开始,但在用大肠杆菌素K处理的细胞中,Mg(2+)损失的开始会延迟1至10分钟,这取决于温度和大肠杆菌素K的感染复数。这两种大肠杆菌素与能量产生代谢的化学抑制剂不同;能量毒物会阻断Mg(2+)和Co(2+)的运输,但两种大肠杆菌素都会增加对Mg(2+)和Co(2+)的被动通透性。能量产生代谢(以及Mg(2+)交换)的抑制剂会阻断任何一种大肠杆菌素引发的Mg(2+)损失,但一旦Mg(2+)损失开始,它们并不能阻止大肠杆菌素促进的外流。在加入大肠杆菌素K之前加入大肠杆菌素E1可防止大肠杆菌素K处理的细胞中更快速的Mg(2+)外流。对大肠杆菌素E1和K对Mg(2+)和Co(2+)通透性影响的定量比较使我们得出结论,这两种大肠杆菌素的作用方式并不相同。