• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种常用镇静剂对低速驾驶性能测试的影响。

Effects of four commonly-used tranquillizers on low-speed driving performance tests.

作者信息

Betts T A, Clayton A B, Mackay G M

出版信息

Br Med J. 1972 Dec 9;4(5840):580-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5840.580.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.4.5840.580
PMID:4566100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1786808/
Abstract

A double-blind controlled comparison of four commonly-used tranquillizing drugs (haloperidol, amylobarbitone sodium, chlordiazepoxide, and trifluoperazine) against placebo was made in their effects on the performance of volunteers during three low speed vehicle-handling tests. The drugs (with the exception of haloperidol) significantly altered driving behaviour though they did not seem to interact significantly with alcohol. There is, therefore, a strong possibility that such drugs will similarly alter driving performance in patients taking them for therapeutic purposes. Since, as these experiments also show, those affected may be subjectively unaware of it, and routine clinical screening is not sensitive enough to detect them, physicians should warn patients of the probability that their driving performance will be affected by such drugs, particularly during the first few days that they are taken.

摘要

对四种常用镇静药物(氟哌啶醇、戊巴比妥钠、氯氮卓和三氟拉嗪)与安慰剂进行了双盲对照比较,观察它们在三项低速车辆操控测试中对志愿者表现的影响。这些药物(氟哌啶醇除外)显著改变了驾驶行为,尽管它们似乎与酒精没有显著相互作用。因此,服用这些药物用于治疗目的的患者,其驾驶性能很可能同样会受到影响。由于这些实验还表明,受影响者可能主观上并未意识到这一点,而且常规临床筛查不够灵敏,无法检测到这些影响,医生应警告患者,此类药物可能会影响其驾驶性能,尤其是在服药的头几天。

相似文献

1
Effects of four commonly-used tranquillizers on low-speed driving performance tests.四种常用镇静剂对低速驾驶性能测试的影响。
Br Med J. 1972 Dec 9;4(5840):580-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5840.580.
2
A study of the effects of certain tranquillizers and small amounts of alcohol on driving performance.
Eur J Toxicol. 1972 Jul-Aug;5(4):254-6.
3
Effects of diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, thioridazine, haloperidole, flupenthixole and alcohol on psychomotor skills related to driving.地西泮、氯氮䓬、硫利达嗪、氟哌啶醇、三氟噻吨及酒精对与驾驶相关的精神运动技能的影响。
Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1973 Mar;51(3):125-32.
4
Effect of two weeks' treatment with chlordiazepoxide or flupenthixole, alone or in combination with alcohol, on psychomotor skills related to driving.氯氮卓或氟哌噻吨单独或与酒精联合使用两周对与驾驶相关的精神运动技能的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1975 Jul;25(7):1088-92.
5
Effect of active metabolites of chlordiazepoxide and diazepam, alone or in combination with alcohol, on psychomotor skills related to driving.氯氮卓和地西泮的活性代谢产物单独或与酒精联合使用对与驾驶相关的精神运动技能的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Jul 30;13(5):345-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00644607.
6
Effect of active metabolites of chlordiazepoxide and diazepam, alone or in combination with alcohol, on psychomotor skills related to driving.氯氮䓬和地西泮的活性代谢物单独或与酒精联合使用对与驾驶相关的精神运动技能的影响。
Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1976;11:79-84. doi: 10.1159/000399455.
7
[Traffic, tranquilizing agents and alcohol].[交通、镇静剂与酒精]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967 Sep 1;92(35):1525-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1105770.
8
Persistent behavioural and electroencephalographic changes after single doses of nitrazepam and amylobarbitone sodium.单次服用硝西泮和戊巴比妥钠后的持续性行为和脑电图变化。
Br Med J. 1970 Jun 27;2(5712):762-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5712.762.
9
International seminar research on alcohol, drugs and driving.
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1973 Mar;6(2):104-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094373.
10
The psychomotor effects of paroxetine alone and in combination with haloperidol, amylobarbitone, oxazepam, or alcohol.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1989;350:53-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb07174.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of motor vehicle operator performance assessments for benzodiazepine receptor agonists.苯二氮䓬受体激动剂机动车驾驶员性能评估的范围综述
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Nov 9;16:100538. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100538. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Drugs and driving.药物与驾驶。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1974 Dec;1(6):451-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1974.tb01693.x.
3
The effect of propranolol versus placebo on resident surgical performance.普萘洛尔与安慰剂对住院医师手术操作表现的影响。
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;96:283-91; discussion 291-4.
4
Performance tests.性能测试。
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):247-73. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s2247.
5
Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs.精神运动功能与精神活性药物。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Sep;10(3):189-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01745.x.
6
A comparison of methods for assessing the sedative effects of diphenhydramine on skills related to car driving.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;27(4):477-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00549598.
7
Traffic accidents and minor tranquilizers: a review.交通事故与镇静剂:综述
Public Health Rep. 1984 Nov-Dec;99(6):572-4.
8
Diazepam/beta-adrenoceptor antagonist interactions.地西泮/β-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂相互作用
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):69S-76S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02431.x.
9
Effect of two hypnotic drugs on actual driving performance next morning.两种催眠药物对次日早晨实际驾驶表现的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Sep 25;285(6345):852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6345.852.
10
The effects of clobazam and lorazepam on aspects of psychomotor performance and car handling ability.氯巴占和劳拉西泮对精神运动表现及车辆操控能力各方面的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Aug;10(2):145-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01731.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Continued meprobamate and proclorperazine administration and behavior.
AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1958 Aug;80(2):247-52. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1958.02340080117025.
2
[Driving tests to determine the influence of alcohol, tranquilizers and hypnotics on driing capability].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1969 Feb 14;94(7):301-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1108946.
3
Drugs and highway crashes. Can we separate fact from fancy?
JAMA. 1971 Mar 1;215(9):1477-82.
4
[Traffic, tranquilizing agents and alcohol].[交通、镇静剂与酒精]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967 Sep 1;92(35):1525-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1105770.