Suppr超能文献

头孢孟多、头孢西丁和头孢呋辛在琼脂和肉汤中的最低抑菌浓度比较。

Comparison between agar and broth minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefamandole, Cefoxitin, and cefuroxime.

作者信息

Rylander M, Brorson J E, Johnsson J, Norrby R

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Apr;15(4):572-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.4.572.

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibility to cefamandole, cefoxitin, and cefuroxime of clinical isolates of Streptococcus faecalis, Klebsiella, and indole-positive Proteus was assayed using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations in broth and on solid media. It could be demonstrated that the agar dilution MICs obtained when S. faecalis was tested against cefuroxime and when indole-positive Proteus strains were tested against cefamandole tended to be considerably lower than those obtained with the broth dilution technique. The Klebsiella strains tested did not show any major differences with regard to MICs in broth or on solid media. Using an animal experimental infection model it could be demonstrated that with indole-positive Proteus the higher broth MIC correlated better to the observed data than the lower agar MIC when a beta-lactamase-producing strain was tested. The data obtained indicated that the beta-lactamase of the indole-positive Proteus strain was inducible. The results of the study gave evidence for a risk of false susceptibility of some bacterial species against cefamandole when agar techniques, e.g. paper disk diffusion, are used. For cefuroxime, the same phenomenon can be expected with S. faecalis and to some extent with indole-positive Proteus. In this study, cefoxitin seemed considerably less affected by the technique used for susceptibility testing.

摘要

采用肉汤稀释法和固体培养基上的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定法,检测了粪肠球菌、克雷伯菌和吲哚阳性变形杆菌临床分离株对头孢孟多、头孢西丁和头孢呋辛的体外敏感性。结果表明,在检测粪肠球菌对头孢呋辛以及吲哚阳性变形杆菌菌株对头孢孟多时,琼脂稀释法测得的MIC往往显著低于肉汤稀释法。所检测的克雷伯菌菌株在肉汤或固体培养基中的MIC没有显示出任何重大差异。使用动物实验感染模型可以证明,当检测产β-内酰胺酶的吲哚阳性变形杆菌菌株时,肉汤中较高的MIC比较低的琼脂MIC与观察数据的相关性更好。获得的数据表明,吲哚阳性变形杆菌菌株的β-内酰胺酶是可诱导的。研究结果证明,当使用琼脂技术(如纸片扩散法)时,某些细菌对头孢孟多可能存在假敏感风险。对于头孢呋辛,粪肠球菌以及在一定程度上吲哚阳性变形杆菌也可能出现同样的现象。在本研究中,头孢西丁似乎受药敏试验所用技术的影响小得多。

相似文献

3
In vitro evaluation of cefoxitin and cefamandole.头孢西丁和头孢孟多的体外评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jun;9(6):1019-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.6.1019.

引用本文的文献

2
CombiANT: Antibiotic interaction testing made easy.CombiANT:让抗生素相互作用检测变得轻松。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Sep 17;18(9):e3000856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000856. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验