Verbist L
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Aug;16(2):115-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.16.2.115.
The in vitro activities of the new ureidopenicillins piperacillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin, and Bay k 4999 were compared with those of ampicillin and ticarcillin against 336 Enterobacteriaceae, 109 nonfermenters, 55 Neisseria, and 28 Haemophilus influenzae isolates. Bay k 4999 displayed the largest spectrum of activity and had lower minimal inhibitory concentrations than any of the other penicillins against all of the species tested. Piperacillin showed the same spectrum but was slightly less active than Bay k 4999; it was slightly more effective than mezlocillin against Enterobacteriaceae and fully as active as azlocillin against Pseudomonas. All ureidopenicillins were substantially more active than ampicillin and ticarcillin. Isolates highly resistant to ampicillin or ticarcillin were also less susceptible to the ureidopenicillins.
将新型脲基青霉素哌拉西林、美洛西林、阿洛西林和Bay k 4999的体外活性与氨苄西林和替卡西林进行了比较,受试菌株包括336株肠杆菌科细菌、109株非发酵菌、55株奈瑟菌和28株流感嗜血杆菌。Bay k 4999的活性谱最广,对所有受试菌种的最低抑菌浓度均低于其他任何一种青霉素。哌拉西林显示出相同的活性谱,但活性略低于Bay k 4999;它对肠杆菌科细菌的活性略高于美洛西林,对铜绿假单胞菌的活性与阿洛西林完全相同。所有脲基青霉素的活性均显著高于氨苄西林和替卡西林。对氨苄西林或替卡西林高度耐药的菌株对脲基青霉素的敏感性也较低。