Klein G, Pearson G, Nadkarni J S, Nadkarni J J, Klein E, Henle G, Henle W, Clifford P
J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1011-20. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1011.
A comparison was made of the immunofluorescence tests for detection of cell membrane and Epstein-Barr virus antigens in cells from Burkitt tumor biopsies or continuous cultures derived therefrom. On the whole, cell membrane fluorescence in established lines appeared to depend not only upon the presence of EBV but to a considerable degree also upon the extent of the persistent viral infection. There was no constant relationship, however, between the results of the two tests and exceptions to the rule were noted. These observations indicate that different antigens are involved in the two tests. Biopsy cells in general and young cultures may reveal strong MIF activity but few, if any, EBV-positive cells. The reverse, the presence of relatively large numbers of EBV antigen-containing cells in the absence of significant MIF reactions, was also noted on occasion in a few established cultures. The possible interpretations of these findings have been discussed.
对检测伯基特淋巴瘤活检组织或由此获得的连续培养细胞中的细胞膜和爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒抗原的免疫荧光试验进行了比较。总体而言,已建立细胞系中的细胞膜荧光似乎不仅取决于EBV的存在,还在很大程度上取决于持续性病毒感染的程度。然而,这两种检测结果之间没有固定的关系,并且注意到了该规则的例外情况。这些观察结果表明,两种检测涉及不同的抗原。一般来说,活检细胞和年轻培养物可能显示出强烈的MIF活性,但EBV阳性细胞很少,如果有的话。在一些已建立的培养物中偶尔也会注意到相反的情况,即在没有明显MIF反应的情况下存在相对大量含EBV抗原的细胞。已经讨论了这些发现的可能解释。