Harris S L, Wolchik S A
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):185-98. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-185.
Four boys with autistic-like behavior were treated for self-stimulatory behavior with three different treatment procedures--time out, differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO), and overcorrection. All four boys showed a rapid response to the overcorrection procedure. Three boys demonstrated some evidence of decrement in responding with time-out. During the DRO procedure, one showed a modest decrease, two showed no change, but one exhibited a consistent increase in responding under this condition. A multiple baseline applied to one of the subjects failed to reveal any generalization of suppression from one setting to another. A strong but not perfect relationship was found between a frequency and a duration measure of self-stimulation. There was some evidence of negative side effects for one boy during overcorrection and for another during time-out. None of these negative side effects was enduring. There was also some indirect evidence that overcorrection facilitated appropriate play.
四名有类似自闭症行为的男孩接受了三种不同治疗程序——隔离、对其他行为的差别强化(DRO)和过度矫正——以治疗自我刺激行为。所有四名男孩对过度矫正程序均表现出快速反应。三名男孩在隔离程序中有一些反应减少的迹象。在DRO程序中,一名男孩表现出适度下降,两名男孩没有变化,但一名男孩在此条件下反应持续增加。应用于其中一名受试者的多重基线未能显示出抑制从一种情境泛化到另一种情境的情况。在自我刺激的频率和持续时间测量之间发现了一种强烈但并不完美的关系。有证据表明,一名男孩在过度矫正期间以及另一名男孩在隔离期间出现了负面副作用。这些负面副作用均未持续存在。也有一些间接证据表明过度矫正促进了适当的玩耍。