Finch A J, Kendall P C, Spirito A, Entin A, Montgomery L E, Schwartz D J
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1979 Sep;7(3):337-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00916543.
Two analyses of the WISC-R protocols of 100 children referred for behavioral problems in school were conducted to study (a) the utility of a variety of WISC short forms and (b) the factor structure of the WISC-R. Although the correlations between short form and WISC-R IQs were highly significant, mean differences and a high percentage of IQ classification changes indicated that the short forms were not acceptable WISC-R substitutes. Different factor analyses consistently evidenced two factors, Verbal Comprehension and Perceptual Organization, which corresponded perfectly to the Verbal and Performance.
对100名因在学校存在行为问题而被转介的儿童的韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)测试记录进行了两项分析,以研究:(a)各种WISC简式量表的效用,以及(b)WISC-R的因素结构。尽管简式量表与WISC-R智商之间的相关性非常显著,但平均差异和较高比例的智商分类变化表明,简式量表不能作为可接受的WISC-R替代量表。不同的因素分析一致证明存在两个因素,即言语理解和知觉组织,这与言语量表和操作量表完全对应。