• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

枯草芽孢杆菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶的比较。

Comparison of the alpha-amylase of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.

作者信息

Welker N E, Campbell L L

出版信息

J Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(4):1131-5. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1131-1135.1967.

DOI:10.1128/jb.94.4.1131-1135.1967
PMID:4963775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC276784/
Abstract

The alpha-amylase (alpha-1,4-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) of Bacillus subtilis strain W23 is less negatively-charged than the alpha-amylase of B. amyloliquefaciens strain F, as determined by electrophoretic mobility in polyacrylamide gel at pH 8.6. The alpha-amylase of strain W23 is immunologically unrelated to the alpha-amylase of strain F, as judged by lack of cross-reaction in Ouchterlony immunodiffusion studies. The pH range of maximal activity for the enzyme of strain W23 was 5.7 to 6.7, with a maximum at 6.3. The pH range of activity for the alpha-amylase of strain F was 5.5 to 6.5, with a maximum at 5.9. No significant difference was found in the effect of temperature on the activity of the alpha-amylase of strain W23 and strain F. alpha-Amylase production by strain W23 occurs throughout the 7-hr growth period, whereas enzyme production by strain F does not begin until the culture enters the stationary phase of growth. The total amounts of enzyme produced by strains W23 and F after 7 hr of growth were 0.3 and 25.5 units/ml, respectively.

摘要

在pH 8.6的聚丙烯酰胺凝胶中通过电泳迁移率测定,枯草芽孢杆菌W23菌株的α-淀粉酶(α-1,4-葡聚糖4-葡聚糖水解酶,EC 3.2.1.1)比解淀粉芽孢杆菌F菌株的α-淀粉酶带负电荷少。在双向免疫扩散研究中,通过缺乏交叉反应判断,W23菌株的α-淀粉酶与F菌株的α-淀粉酶在免疫上不相关。W23菌株的该酶最大活性的pH范围为5.7至6.7,最大值在6.3。F菌株的α-淀粉酶的活性pH范围为5.5至6.5,最大值在5.9。未发现温度对W23菌株和F菌株的α-淀粉酶活性的影响有显著差异。W23菌株在整个7小时的生长期间都产生α-淀粉酶,而F菌株直到培养物进入生长稳定期才开始产生该酶。生长7小时后,W23菌株和F菌株产生的酶总量分别为0.3和25.5单位/毫升。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/276784/72ef82092da4/jbacter00405-0391-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/276784/d7e6a32a6355/jbacter00405-0390-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/276784/72ef82092da4/jbacter00405-0391-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/276784/d7e6a32a6355/jbacter00405-0390-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/276784/72ef82092da4/jbacter00405-0391-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the alpha-amylase of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.枯草芽孢杆菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶的比较。
J Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(4):1131-5. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1131-1135.1967.
2
Unrelatedness of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis.解淀粉芽孢杆菌与枯草芽孢杆菌的非亲缘关系
J Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(4):1124-30. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1124-1130.1967.
3
Sequence of the N-terminal half of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens alpha-amylase.解淀粉芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶N端半段的序列
Biochem J. 1980 Feb 1;185(2):387-95. doi: 10.1042/bj1850387.
4
Molecular cloning of alpha-amylase gene from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and its expression in B. subtilis.解淀粉芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶基因的分子克隆及其在枯草芽孢杆菌中的表达。
Gene. 1982 Jul-Aug;19(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90191-3.
5
Influence of pH and aeration on bacterial formation of amylase.pH值和通气对淀粉酶细菌形成的影响。
Appl Microbiol. 1970 Mar;19(3):535. doi: 10.1128/am.19.3.535-535.1970.
6
Regulatory factors affecting alpha-amylase production in bacillus licheniformis.影响地衣芽孢杆菌中α-淀粉酶产生的调控因子
J Bacteriol. 1975 Mar;121(3):848-56. doi: 10.1128/jb.121.3.848-856.1975.
7
N-terminal amino acid sequence of Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase: comparison with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis Enzymes.地衣芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶的N端氨基酸序列:与解淀粉芽孢杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌酶的比较
J Bacteriol. 1982 Jan;149(1):372-3. doi: 10.1128/jb.149.1.372-373.1982.
8
Genetic control of the rate of alpha-amylase synthesis in Bacillus subtilis.枯草芽孢杆菌中α-淀粉酶合成速率的遗传控制
J Bacteriol. 1974 Aug;119(2):410-5. doi: 10.1128/jb.119.2.410-415.1974.
9
[Thermophyllic bacteria producing active amylase].[产活性淀粉酶的嗜热细菌]
Mikrobiologiia. 1966 May-Jun;35(3):427-34.
10
Stable, inducible thermoacidophilic alpha-amylase from Bacillus acidocaldarius.来自嗜酸热芽孢杆菌的稳定、可诱导的嗜热嗜酸α淀粉酶。
J Bacteriol. 1976 Nov;128(2):515-21. doi: 10.1128/jb.128.2.515-521.1976.

引用本文的文献

1
Actions and Interactions of Mirror-Image Cyclodextrins.镜像环糊精的作用与相互作用
JACS Au. 2024 Dec 19;5(2):693-701. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00962. eCollection 2025 Feb 24.
2
CECT 5940 improves performance and gut function in broilers fed different levels of protein and/or under necrotic enteritis challenge.CECT 5940可提高不同蛋白质水平饲养和/或遭受坏死性肠炎挑战的肉鸡的生产性能和肠道功能。
Anim Nutr. 2021 Mar;7(1):185-197. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
3
Draft Genome Sequence of the Industrially Significant Bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NRRL 942.

本文引用的文献

1
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.使用福林酚试剂进行蛋白质测定。
J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75.
2
THE PHYSICAL AND GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A TRANSFORMABLE ENZYME: BACILLUS SUBTILIS ALPHA-AMYLASE.一种可转化酶的物理及遗传特性:枯草芽孢杆菌α淀粉酶
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Aug 26;89:277-90. doi: 10.1016/0926-6569(64)90216-0.
3
EFFECT OF CARBON SOURCES ON FORMATION OF ALPHA-AMYLASE BY BACILLUS STEAROTHERMOPHILUS.碳源对嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌产生α-淀粉酶的影响
具有工业重要性的细菌解淀粉芽孢杆菌NRRL 942的基因组序列草图
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2018 Nov 8;7(18). doi: 10.1128/MRA.01374-18. eCollection 2018 Nov.
4
Structure of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens alpha-amylase at high resolution: implications for thermal stability.解淀粉芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶的高分辨率结构:对热稳定性的影响
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2010 Feb 1;66(Pt 2):121-9. doi: 10.1107/S1744309109051938. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
5
Purification and Characterization of alpha-Amylase from Bacillus licheniformis CUMC305.从地衣芽孢杆菌 CUMC305 中纯化和鉴定α-淀粉酶。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Aug;46(2):430-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.2.430-437.1983.
6
Identification of an intracellular pyrimidine-specific endoribonuclease from Bacillus subtilis.
J Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;175(20):6717-20. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.20.6717-6720.1993.
7
Nucleotide sequence of the amylase gene from Bacillus subtilis.枯草芽孢杆菌淀粉酶基因的核苷酸序列。
Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jan 25;11(2):237-49. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.2.237.
8
N-terminal amino acid sequence of Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase: comparison with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis Enzymes.地衣芽孢杆菌α-淀粉酶的N端氨基酸序列:与解淀粉芽孢杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌酶的比较
J Bacteriol. 1982 Jan;149(1):372-3. doi: 10.1128/jb.149.1.372-373.1982.
9
The production of alpha-amylase in batch and chemostat culture by Bacillus stearothermophilus.嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌在分批培养和恒化器培养中α-淀粉酶的产生。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1980;46(4):391-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00421985.
10
Effect of potassium ions on the attachment of polyribosomes to the membranes in lysates of exponential-phase cells of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.钾离子对解淀粉芽孢杆菌指数生长期细胞裂解物中多核糖体与膜附着的影响。
Biochem J. 1969 May;112(4):533-9. doi: 10.1042/bj1120533.
J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86(4):681-6. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.681-686.1963.
4
IDENTIFICATION OF COLEMAN'S SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM AS A MESOPHILIC RELATIVE OF CLOSTRIDIUM NIGRIFICANS.鉴定科尔曼硫酸盐还原菌为黑化梭菌的嗜温亲缘菌。
J Bacteriol. 1963 Aug;86(2):274-9. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.2.274-279.1963.
5
Studies on alpha-amylase formation by Bacillus subtilis.枯草芽孢杆菌产生α-淀粉酶的研究。
Biochem J. 1962 May;83(2):256-63. doi: 10.1042/bj0830256.
6
A comparison of two proteinases from Bacillus subtilis.来自枯草芽孢杆菌的两种蛋白酶的比较。
C R Trav Lab Carlsberg. 1960;32:63-74.
7
A comparison of three proteinases from various strains of Bacillus subtilis.来自不同枯草芽孢杆菌菌株的三种蛋白酶的比较。
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Apr 1;48:411-2. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90498-x.
8
Effects of carbon sources and base analogues of nucleic acid on the formation of bacterial amylase.碳源和核酸碱基类似物对细菌淀粉酶形成的影响。
Nature. 1957 Aug 31;180(4583):438-9. doi: 10.1038/180438b0.
9
Unrelatedness of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis.解淀粉芽孢杆菌与枯草芽孢杆菌的非亲缘关系
J Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(4):1124-30. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1124-1130.1967.
10
Characteristics of alpha-amylase formation by Bacillus subtilis.枯草芽孢杆菌形成α-淀粉酶的特性。
Nature. 1966 Jul 16;211(5046):306-7. doi: 10.1038/211306a0.