Ulrich R, Wolfe M, Dulaney S
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):1009-15. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1009.
Squirrel monkeys were restrained in a chair equipped with a tail-shock apparatus and a pneumatic bite hose located in front of the subject's face. An aggressive response was recorded when the monkey bit the hose. Initial sessions in which no shocks were delivered produced some biting. When biting during these sessions stabilized at a near-zero level, regularly scheduled shocks were delivered to the monkey's tail, causing a consistently higher rate of biting. After several sessions under these conditions, a punishment phase was introduced in which the previous shock conditions were maintained, and every bite was followed immediately by another, more intense shock. Biting under these conditions was suppressed to a near-zero level. When the punishment contingency was removed, biting increased. With one subject, two additional bite-contingent stimuli were examined: (1) a milder shock that, when made contingent upon hose biting, also suppressed that response, and (2) a contingent tone that had no obvious suppressing or facilitating effect. Individual differences among subjects were extreme, but the effect of bite-contingent shock was consistent. Observations of the subjects during the punishment sessions indicated the existence of certain side effects that resulted from the use of punishment to suppress shock-induced aggression.
松鼠猴被限制在一把装有尾巴电击装置和位于受试对象面部前方的气动咬管的椅子上。当猴子咬住管子时,记录其攻击反应。最初不施加电击的阶段会出现一些咬管行为。当这些阶段的咬管行为稳定在接近零的水平时,定期对猴子的尾巴施加电击,导致咬管率持续升高。在这些条件下进行了几次实验后,引入了惩罚阶段,在此阶段维持先前的电击条件,并且每次咬管后立即施加另一次更强的电击。在这些条件下,咬管行为被抑制到接近零的水平。当取消惩罚条件时,咬管行为增加。对于一只受试对象,还研究了另外两种与咬管相关的刺激:(1)一种较弱的电击,当它与咬管相关联时,也会抑制这种反应;(2)一种与咬管相关的音调,没有明显的抑制或促进作用。受试对象之间的个体差异很大,但与咬管相关的电击的效果是一致的。在惩罚实验期间对受试对象的观察表明,使用惩罚来抑制电击诱发的攻击行为会产生某些副作用。