Chappell W A, Calisher C H, Toole R F, Maness K C, Sasso D R, Henderson B E
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1100-3. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1100-1103.1971.
During the 1969 dengue epidemic in Puerto Rico, human sera and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were collected for virus isolation and identification. Three methods of isolation were used and compared. In the first method, we inoculated newborn mice by the intracranial route, noted any signs of illness, and serially passed specimens in mice until virus was isolated. In the second method, we inoculated tube cultures of LLC-MK(2) cells, noted any cytopathic effect (CPE), and assayed fluids for virus by plaque formation in LLC-MK(2) cell monolayers. The third method was different from the second only in that the original specimens were first inoculated into fluid cultures of Singh's A. albopictus cells. No significant CPE was seen in LLC-MK(2) cultures; however, distinct syncytial CPE was observed in A. albopictus cells. About the same number of virus isolates were made in each isolation system. Virus isolates from both sera and mosquitoes were identified as dengue type 2 by a plaque-reduction neutralization test in LLC-MK(2) cells. The utility of the three methods, individually or in combination, is discussed and related to diagnostic and epidemic situations.
1969年波多黎各登革热疫情期间,采集了人类血清和埃及伊蚊用于病毒分离和鉴定。使用并比较了三种分离方法。第一种方法是通过颅内途径接种新生小鼠,记录任何疾病迹象,并在小鼠中连续传代标本直至分离出病毒。第二种方法是接种LLC-MK(2)细胞的管培养物,记录任何细胞病变效应(CPE),并通过在LLC-MK(2)细胞单层中形成噬斑来检测液体中的病毒。第三种方法与第二种方法的不同之处仅在于原始标本首先接种到辛格白纹伊蚊细胞的液体培养物中。在LLC-MK(2)培养物中未观察到明显的CPE;然而,在白纹伊蚊细胞中观察到明显的合胞体CPE。每个分离系统中分离出的病毒数量大致相同。通过在LLC-MK(2)细胞中进行噬斑减少中和试验,将来自血清和蚊子的病毒分离株鉴定为登革热2型。讨论了这三种方法单独或联合使用的效用,并将其与诊断和疫情情况相关联。