Smyllie H C, Taylor M P, Cuninghame-Green R A
Br Med J. 1972 Jan 1;1(5791):34-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5791.34.
The speed of admission of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction was observed over a period of 12 months during which a "no refusal" coronary care scheme was functioning, with emphasis on minimizing delay. During the same period the duration of survival of cases diagnosed as coronary thrombosis by the coroner's pathologist was measured. Comparison of the two series shows that 75% to 80% of the coroner's cases had died before the median time of notification of the general practitioner by those patients referred to hospital.We argue that the provision of mobile coronary care on request from general practitioners is unlikely to have an appreciable effect in preventing deaths from acute myocardial infarction outside hospital.
在一项“无拒绝”冠心病护理计划实施的12个月期间,观察了疑似急性心肌梗死患者的入院速度,该计划重点在于尽量减少延误。在同一时期,对法医病理学家诊断为冠状动脉血栓形成病例的存活时间进行了测量。这两个系列的比较表明,在那些被转诊至医院的患者中,75%至80%的法医病例在全科医生接到通知的中位时间之前就已死亡。我们认为,应全科医生请求提供移动冠心病护理,对于预防院外急性心肌梗死死亡不太可能产生显著效果。