Bart K J, Khan M, Mosley W H
Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(3):421-9.
A clear difference has been observed between the classical Inaba V. cholerae and the El Tor Ogawa V. cholerae in relation to the ability to isolate the organism from the environment.An early attempt to utilize nightsoil sampling as a tool to measure the extent of infection in the community during an epidemic of classical Inaba cholera in Dacca, East Pakistan, in the spring and fall of 1968 proved unsuccessful. During an epidemic caused by both the classical Inaba and the El Tor Ogawa vibrios in Chittagong between July 1968 and March 1969 the reasons for this failure became apparent. In Dacca, only 2 isolations of classical Inaba were made from 9906 individual latrine and pooled communal nightsoil samples, whereas in Chittagong, from 62 588 similar samples in which 2 classical Inaba isolations were also made, there were 52 El Tor Ogawa isolations. In areas where cases due to both biotypes were occurring simultaneously, El Tor Ogawa vibrios were isolated 10 times more frequently than the classical Inaba.It remains unclear whether the differences observed between El Tor Ogawa and classical Inaba are related to the biotype or to the serotype of the organism, or to both. An extrapolation of nightsoil sampling, therefore, to the incidence and prevalence of infection in a community must consider both the biotype and the serotype.
已观察到,在从环境中分离霍乱弧菌的能力方面,古典生物型稻叶型霍乱弧菌与埃尔托小川型霍乱弧菌存在明显差异。1968年春秋季,在东巴基斯坦达卡发生古典生物型稻叶型霍乱流行期间,曾尝试利用夜间粪便采样来衡量社区的感染程度,但未成功。1968年7月至1969年3月,在吉大港发生由古典生物型稻叶型霍乱弧菌和埃尔托小川型霍乱弧菌共同引起的疫情期间,失败的原因变得显而易见。在达卡,从9906份个体厕所粪便样本和混合的公共夜间粪便样本中仅分离出2株古典生物型稻叶型霍乱弧菌,而在吉大港,从62588份类似样本(其中也分离出2株古典生物型稻叶型霍乱弧菌)中,分离出52株埃尔托小川型霍乱弧菌。在两种生物型病例同时出现的地区,埃尔托小川型霍乱弧菌的分离频率比古典生物型稻叶型霍乱弧菌高10倍。目前尚不清楚在埃尔托小川型霍乱弧菌和古典生物型稻叶型霍乱弧菌之间观察到的差异是与该生物体的生物型有关,还是与血清型有关,或者与两者都有关。因此,将夜间粪便采样推断为社区感染的发病率和流行率时,必须同时考虑生物型和血清型。