Van Ramshorst J D
Bull World Health Organ. 1971;45(2):213-8.
Available methods for titrating diphtheria and tetanus antitoxin at low concentrations in human or animal blood are surveyed, with special attention to the amount of serum required for the test.In vivo methods, especially the rabbit or guinea-pig intradermal test for diphtheria and the mouse test for tetanus, are precise and reliable. If, however, serum levels as low as about 0.001 IU/ml have to be determined, rather large amounts of serum are required: moreover, the tests are rather time-consuming and expensive.Tissue culture methods are available only for diphtheria antitoxin titration. The titres found coincide very well with those from animal tests. The titrations are less time-consuming and more economical. These methods seem to be very promising for the replacement of animal tests. Of the real in vitro methods, the haemagglutination procedure has been investigated most thoroughly and used most frequently. Low titres can be measured using small amounts of serum, but the titres thus obtained may differ considerably from those obtained in animal tests, at least for individual sera. For mass screening, the method is very suitable.A number of other methods are briefly discussed, but they are either less suitable or have not yet been sufficiently investigated.
对在人或动物血液中低浓度滴定白喉和破伤风抗毒素的现有方法进行了调查,特别关注测试所需的血清量。体内方法,尤其是用于白喉的兔或豚鼠皮内试验以及用于破伤风的小鼠试验,精确且可靠。然而,如果必须测定低至约0.001 IU/ml的血清水平,则需要相当大量的血清;此外,这些试验相当耗时且昂贵。组织培养方法仅可用于白喉抗毒素滴定。所测得的效价与动物试验所得结果非常吻合。滴定耗时较少且更经济。这些方法对于替代动物试验似乎非常有前景。在真正的体外方法中,血凝程序研究得最彻底且使用最频繁。使用少量血清可测量低滴度,但由此获得的滴度可能与动物试验所得结果有很大差异,至少对于个别血清是这样。对于大规模筛查,该方法非常合适。还简要讨论了一些其他方法,但它们要么不太合适,要么尚未得到充分研究。