Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Robichon-Szulmajster H
J Bacteriol. 1971 Jun;106(3):758-72. doi: 10.1128/jb.106.3.758-772.1971.
Detailed study of methionine-mediated repression of enzymes involved in methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae led to classification of these enzymes into two distinct regulatory groups. Group I comprises four enzymes specifically involved in different parts of methionine biosynthesis, namely, homoserine-O-transacetylase, homocysteine synthetase, adenosine triphosphate sulfurylase, and sulfite reductase. Repressibility of these enzymes is greatly decreased in strains carrying a genetically impaired methionyl-transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) synthetase (mutation ts(-) 296). Conditions leading to absence of repression in the mutant strain have been correlated with a sharp decrease in bulk tRNA(met) charging, whereas conditions which restore repressibility of group I enzymes also restore tRNA(met) charging. These findings implicate methionyl-tRNA in the regulatory process. However, the absence of a correlation in the wild type between methionyl-tRNA charging and the levels of methionine group I enzymes suggests that only a minor iso accepting species of tRNA(met) may be devoted with a regulatory function. Repressibility of the same four enzymes (group I) was also decreased in strains carrying the regulatory mutation eth2(r). Although structural genes coding for two of these enzymes, as well as mutations ts(-) 296 and eth2(r) segregate independently to each other, synthesis of group I enzymes is coordinated. The pleiotropic regulatory system involved seems then to comprise beside a "regulatory methionyl tRNA(met)," another element, product of gene eth2, which might correspond either to an aporepressor protein or to the "regulatory tRNA(met)" itself. Regulation of group II enzymes is defined by response to exogenous methionine, absence of response to either mutations ts(-) 296 and eth2(r), and absence of coordinacy with group I enzymes. However, the two enzymes which belong to this group and are both involved in threonine and methionine biosynthesis undergo distinct regulatory patterns. One, aspartokinase, is subject to a bivalent repression exerted by threonine and methionine, and the other, homoserine dehydrogenase, is subject only to methionine-mediated repression. Participation of at least another aporepressor and another corepressor, different from the ones involved in regulation of group I enzymes, is discussed.
对酿酒酵母中甲硫氨酸介导的甲硫氨酸生物合成相关酶的阻遏作用进行的详细研究,导致这些酶被分为两个不同的调控组。第一组包括四种专门参与甲硫氨酸生物合成不同部分的酶,即高丝氨酸 - O - 转乙酰酶、同型半胱氨酸合成酶、三磷酸腺苷硫酸化酶和亚硫酸盐还原酶。在携带遗传受损的甲硫氨酰 - 转移核糖核酸(tRNA)合成酶(突变体ts(-) 296)的菌株中,这些酶的可阻遏性大大降低。导致突变菌株中不存在阻遏作用的条件与大量tRNA(met)充电量的急剧下降相关,而恢复第一组酶可阻遏性的条件也恢复了tRNA(met)充电。这些发现表明甲硫氨酰 - tRNA参与了调控过程。然而,在野生型中,甲硫氨酰 - tRNA充电与甲硫氨酸第一组酶的水平之间缺乏相关性,这表明可能只有一小部分同功接受体种类的tRNA(met)具有调控功能。在携带调控突变eth2(r)的菌株中,同样的四种酶(第一组)的可阻遏性也降低了。尽管编码其中两种酶的结构基因以及突变体ts(-) 296和eth2(r)相互独立分离,但第一组酶的合成是协调的。那么所涉及的多效调控系统似乎除了一种“调控性甲硫氨酰tRNA(met)”之外,还包括另一个元件,即eth2基因的产物,它可能对应于一种无辅基阻遏蛋白或“调控性tRNA(met)”本身。第二组酶的调控由对外源甲硫氨酸的反应、对突变体ts(-) 296和eth2(r)均无反应以及与第一组酶缺乏协调性来定义。然而,属于这一组且都参与苏氨酸和甲硫氨酸生物合成的两种酶经历不同的调控模式。一种是天冬氨酸激酶受到苏氨酸和甲硫氨酸施加的二价阻遏作用,另一种是高丝氨酸脱氢酶仅受到甲硫氨酸介导的阻遏作用。本文讨论了至少另外一种与第一组酶调控所涉及的不同的无辅基阻遏蛋白和另一种辅阻遏物的参与情况。