Aukrust L
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1979;58(4):375-90. doi: 10.1159/000232217.
Cladosporium herbarum was supplied from two sources and extracted identically. Antisera against the extracts were produced in rabbits and two reference patterns were established using crossed immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). Both patterns showed more than 60 precipitates but less than 50% of the detectable antigens appeared to be identical in the two extracts. The allergens were identified by means of crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis (CRIE) using sera from 35 individuals with proven or suspected allergy to C. herbarum. Four important and 10-20 less important allergens were demonstrated. Among the allergens present, there were none reacting with all patient sera. Only 1 out of 3 rabbits immunized with a suspension of broken cells of C. herbarum showed precipitating antibodies to the statistically most important allergen, while 9 rabbits immunized with aqueous extracts of the mold did not. The composition of the two extracts with respect to allergens differed. Allergens present in one extract were not always detectable in the other. The experiments also showed how CIE/CRIE with various combinations of antigens and antisera may be combined with CRIE inhibition, radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and RAST inhibition for comparing complex allergen extracts at the molecular level.
草本枝孢菌来自两个来源,且提取方式相同。用提取物对家兔进行免疫,制备抗血清,并采用交叉免疫电泳(CIE)建立了两种参考图谱。两种图谱均显示有60多种沉淀,但两种提取物中可检测到的抗原似乎只有不到50%是相同的。通过交叉放射免疫电泳(CRIE),使用35名已证实或疑似对草本枝孢菌过敏的个体的血清来鉴定过敏原。结果显示了4种重要过敏原和10 - 20种不太重要的过敏原。在已检测出的过敏原中,没有一种能与所有患者血清发生反应。在用草本枝孢菌破碎细胞悬液免疫的3只家兔中,只有1只对统计学上最重要的过敏原产生了沉淀抗体,而用该霉菌水提取物免疫的9只家兔则未产生。两种提取物中过敏原的组成不同。一种提取物中存在的过敏原在另一种提取物中并不总是能检测到。实验还展示了如何将具有不同抗原和抗血清组合的CIE/CRIE与CRIE抑制、放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)和RAST抑制相结合,以便在分子水平上比较复杂的过敏原提取物。