Greibe J, Bugge P, Gjorup T, Lauritzen T, Bonnevie O, Wulff H R
Br Med J. 1977 Dec 17;2(6102):1572-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6102.1572.
In 1976 we reviewed a randomly selected cohort of 227 patients with duodenal ulcer first diagnosed in 1963. The cohort comprised cases diagnosed in both hospitals and general practice. Fifty patients had died, 12 had emigrated, and 154 (93%) of the remaining patients were interviewed. Fifty-seven medically treated patients had no symptoms, 44 had mild symptoms, and 19 had more severe symptoms. The remaining 34 patients had been treated surgically. Cases diagnosed in hospital had a more severe prognosis than those diagnosed in general practice. A random sample of 65 general practitioners and 78 medical and surgical gastroenterologists tried to predict the results of this study. The range of the predictions was very wide showing that individual prognostic estimates were highly unreliable. The mean prediction by all doctors differed little from the actual result, suggesting that the collective experience of the medical profession is more reliable. The predictions of general practitioners, physicians, and surgeons showed small systematic differences, presumably reflecting the different types of patients they treat.
1976年,我们回顾了1963年首次诊断出的227例十二指肠溃疡患者的随机抽样队列。该队列包括在医院和全科医疗中诊断出的病例。50例患者死亡,12例移民,其余154例(93%)患者接受了访谈。57例接受药物治疗的患者无症状,44例有轻微症状,19例有更严重症状。其余34例患者接受了手术治疗。在医院诊断出的病例比在全科医疗中诊断出的病例预后更差。随机抽取的65名全科医生以及78名内科和外科胃肠病学家试图预测这项研究的结果。预测范围非常广泛,表明个体预后估计极不可靠。所有医生的平均预测与实际结果差异不大,这表明医学专业的集体经验更可靠。全科医生、内科医生和外科医生的预测显示出较小的系统性差异,大概反映了他们治疗的患者类型不同。