Schreibman L, Koegel R L, Craig M S
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977 Dec;5(4):425-36. doi: 10.1007/BF00915090.
It has been repeatedly reported that when presented with a discrimination task involving multiple cues, autistic children, as compared to normal children, tend to respond on the basis of only a restricted portion of the component cues. This phenomenon has been called "stimulus overselectivity" and has been implicated as a possible basis for some of the pronounced behavioral deficits charactertistic of autism. Examination of the results of several previous studies suggests that the overselectivity effect might be reduced with repeated exposure to testing. However, since the previous studies were not designed to test this hypothesis, no conclusions were drawn regarding variables influencing the reduction of the overselectivity phenomenon. The present investigation was therefore conducted to determine if stimulus overselectivity in autistic children is changed as a function of repeated exposure to testing. Nineteen autistic children were trained on a discrimination task with a cue complex composed of two visual cues. After the children reached criterion on the task, they were exposed to a testing phase with probe trials where the cue components were presented singly. The results indicated that 16 of the children initially showed overselectivity and 3 responded to both cues. Of the 16 children who showed overselectivity, 13 decreased their level of overselectivity with continued testing. These results are discussed in relation to variables in the testing procedure itself and to the literature on selective attention.
已有多次报道称,在面对涉及多个线索的辨别任务时,与正常儿童相比,自闭症儿童往往仅基于部分有限的线索成分做出反应。这种现象被称为“刺激过度选择性”,并被认为可能是自闭症一些明显行为缺陷的基础。对之前几项研究结果的考察表明,随着反复接受测试,过度选择性效应可能会降低。然而,由于之前的研究并非旨在检验这一假设,因此未就影响过度选择性现象减轻的变量得出任何结论。因此,本次调查旨在确定自闭症儿童的刺激过度选择性是否会随着反复接受测试而发生变化。19名自闭症儿童接受了一项辨别任务的训练,该任务的线索复合体由两个视觉线索组成。在儿童达到任务标准后,他们进入测试阶段,进行探测试验,其中线索成分单独呈现。结果表明,16名儿童最初表现出过度选择性,3名儿童对两个线索都有反应。在表现出过度选择性的16名儿童中,13名儿童随着持续测试降低了过度选择性水平。本文将结合测试程序本身的变量以及关于选择性注意的文献对这些结果进行讨论。