Macfarlane D E, Elias-Jones T F
Br J Vener Dis. 1977 Dec;53(6):348-52. doi: 10.1136/sti.53.6.348.
Two Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) tests (Wellcome and Fuzizoki) were compared with the automated reagin test and the automated Reiter protein complement-fixation test in a routine screening system. The Wellcome TPHA was shown to lack sensitivity, and it is recommended that it should be used at a lower screening dilution. The Fuzizoki TPHA recorded a significant number of false positive and false negative results, and was therefore inferior to the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test as a definitive test for syphilis. It is suggested that the TPHA be used in conjunction with a reagin test to replace some of the more inadequate screening tests currently in use. The automated screening tests were shown to have a similar sensitivity to the TPHA as well as several other advantages; they are recommended for testing large numbers of specimens.
在一个常规筛查系统中,将两种梅毒螺旋体血细胞凝集试验(TPHA,即威康和藤崎氏试验)与自动反应素试验及自动赖特蛋白补体结合试验进行了比较。结果显示,威康TPHA缺乏敏感性,建议在较低的筛查稀释度下使用。藤崎氏TPHA记录到大量假阳性和假阴性结果,因此作为梅毒的确证试验,其性能不如荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA-ABS)试验。建议将TPHA与反应素试验联合使用,以替代目前使用的一些不够完善的筛查试验。自动筛查试验显示出与TPHA相似的敏感性以及其他几个优点;建议用于检测大量标本。