Macfarlane D E, Hare K, Elias-Jones T F
J Clin Pathol. 1976 Apr;29(4):317-21. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.4.317.
Two methods of performing serological screening tests for syphilis are compared. One consisted of the Venereal Diseases Reference Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the cardiolipin Wassermann reaction (CWR), and the Reiter protein complement fixation test (RPCFT) performed manually; the other was a fully automated system using two Technicon AutoAnalyzers (AAII), one for the automated reagin test (ART) and the other for automated complement fixation tests. The absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTA-ABS) was used as a final arbiter in all cases found to be seropositive by either method. A pooled antigen consisting of a mixture of cardiolipin and Reiter protein was used for the automated complement fixation test, thus increasing the scope and capacity of the system. The AutoAnalyzer was shown to be capable of performing 400 cardiolipin and Reiter complement fixation tests and 700 automated reagin tests in an 8-hour day. Modification of the complement fixation test method to take advantage of the highly sensitive colorimeter resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity and a corresponding saving in reagents. Of the 7843 sera tested, 258 gave a positive result in one or more of the screening tests. The automated test detected many more Reiter positive sera (127) than the manual test (83). Conversely, fewer CWR positive sera were detected by the automated test (60) than by the manual test (82). There was little difference between the number of positive sera detected by the ART (73) and the VDRL slide test (71). In 19 instances the automated tests detected positive sera which registered as completely negative in the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests, and four seropositive cases which the automated tests had failed to detect were detected by the manual tests. It was concluded that a combination of the ART and automated Reiter protein complement fixation test (ARPCFT) would be ideal for use in a large-scale screening programme for the detection of syphilis.
对两种梅毒血清学筛查试验方法进行了比较。一种方法包括性病参考实验室(VDRL)玻片试验、心磷脂瓦氏反应(CWR)和手工操作的赖特蛋白补体结合试验(RPCFT);另一种是使用两台Technicon自动分析仪(AAII)的全自动系统,一台用于自动反应素试验(ART),另一台用于自动补体结合试验。在两种方法检测出血清学阳性的所有病例中,均采用吸收性荧光密螺旋体抗体试验(FTA - ABS)作为最终判定方法。自动补体结合试验使用了由心磷脂和赖特蛋白混合物组成的混合抗原,从而扩大了该系统的检测范围和能力。结果表明,自动分析仪在8小时工作日内能够进行400次心磷脂和赖特补体结合试验以及700次自动反应素试验。对补体结合试验方法进行改进以利用高灵敏度比色计,使得灵敏度显著提高,同时相应节省了试剂。在检测的7843份血清中,有258份在一项或多项筛查试验中呈阳性结果。自动试验检测出的赖特阳性血清(127份)比手工试验(83份)多得多。相反,自动试验检测出的CWR阳性血清(60份)比手工试验(82份)少。ART检测出的阳性血清数量(73份)与VDRL玻片试验(71份)之间差异不大。在19例中,自动试验检测出在手工试验中记录为完全阴性的阳性血清,手工试验检测出4例自动试验未能检测出的血清学阳性病例,并且手工试验还检测出4例自动试验未能检测出的血清学阳性病例。得出的结论是,ART和自动赖特蛋白补体结合试验(ARPCFT)相结合将非常适合用于大规模梅毒检测筛查项目。