Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平与肼屈嗪作为单一抗高血压药物的疗效及安全性比较

Efficacy and safety comparison of nitrendipine and hydralazine as antihypertensive monotherapy.

作者信息

Fagan T C, Sternleib C, Vlachakis N, Deedwania P C, Mehta J L

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1109-13. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198400067-00035.

Abstract

One-hundred and five patients with hypertension received nitrendipine (10-40 mg/day) or hydralazine (50-200 mg/day) in a double-blind randomized design. Nitrendipine decreased supine blood pressure 15/10 mm Hg, and hydralazine decreased it 11/11 mm Hg. Standing blood pressure was decreased 15/12 mm Hg by nitrendipine and 12/11 mm Hg by hydralazine. Supine and standing heart rate rose significantly after both drugs. Blood pressure variation through one dosing interval increased 42% when hydralazine was given but was not altered by nitrendipine. Side-effects from the two drugs were similar in patients who completed the study, but six patients discontinued participation due to side-effects of hydralazine, while only one discontinued due to nitrendipine side-effects. Ten patients required propranolol for hydralazine side-effects, and only three required it for nitrendipine side-effects. Nitrendipine and hydralazine are equally effective as antihypertensive monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension for periods up to 7 weeks, but nitrendipine appears to be better tolerated.

摘要

105例高血压患者采用双盲随机设计,接受尼群地平(10 - 40毫克/天)或肼屈嗪(50 - 200毫克/天)治疗。尼群地平使仰卧位血压降低15/10毫米汞柱,肼屈嗪使其降低11/11毫米汞柱。尼群地平使立位血压降低15/12毫米汞柱,肼屈嗪使其降低12/11毫米汞柱。两种药物治疗后仰卧位和立位心率均显著升高。给予肼屈嗪后,一个给药间隔内的血压变异性增加了42%,而尼群地平未改变血压变异性。完成研究的患者中,两种药物的副作用相似,但有6例患者因肼屈嗪的副作用而退出研究,而因尼群地平副作用退出的仅1例。10例患者因肼屈嗪的副作用需要使用普萘洛尔,因尼群地平副作用需要使用的仅3例。在轻度至中度高血压患者中,尼群地平和肼屈嗪作为抗高血压单一疗法在长达7周的时间内疗效相当,但尼群地平的耐受性似乎更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验