Bakowski M T
Cancer Treat Rev. 1984 Sep;11(3):237-56. doi: 10.1016/0305-7372(84)90010-0.
Evaluation of the activity of anti-emetic drugs in randomized controlled trials has, in most cases, demonstrated the superiority of treatment over placebo administration for the control of chemotherapy-induced emesis (see Table 15). The degree of control of emesis relates both to the intensity of the emetogenic stimulus and to the effectiveness of the anti-emetic agent employed. Prochlorperazine is a relatively weak anti-emetic. The drug exhibits modest activity in the treatment of emesis produced by mild emetogenic stimuli, but is relatively ineffective in the treatment of patients on moderate to severely emetogenic drugs. Domperidone has demonstrated activity against moderately emetogenic stimuli but has not been evaluated in cisplatin-treated patients. The cannabinoids have proved efficacious in the treatment of emesis induced by more severe emetogenic stimuli. THC therapy, however, has been limited in some studies by toxicity. High-dose metoclopramide has demonstrated efficacy in small series of patients in the treatment of cisplatin-induced vomiting. Dexamethasone activity as a single agent is in doubt but the drug may improve the efficacy of metoclopramide when used in combination. For the future, the use of combinations of anti-emetics with differing sites of action and non-overlapping toxicities, may lead to further improvement in efficacy. Combinations of centrally-acting drugs such as the cannabinoids plus dopamine antagonists such as metoclopramide or domperidone, are worth evaluating. The control of anticipatory nausea and vomiting is another major area of interest which has, as yet, not been studied in any depth. A single comparative trial has been reported in the literature (50) and in this study, behavioural therapy rather than drug therapy was evaluated. There may be a place for the evaluation of behavioural therapy in combination with drugs exhibiting anxiolytic properties such as the benzodiazepines and the cannabinoids. Finally, new anti-emetic drugs with an improved therapeutic index will be welcomed by the patient.
在大多数情况下,随机对照试验中对抗呕吐药物活性的评估表明,在控制化疗引起的呕吐方面,治疗优于安慰剂给药(见表15)。呕吐的控制程度既与致吐刺激的强度有关,也与所用抗呕吐药物的有效性有关。丙氯拉嗪是一种相对较弱的抗呕吐药。该药物在治疗由轻度致吐刺激引起的呕吐时表现出适度的活性,但在治疗使用中度至重度致吐药物的患者时相对无效。多潘立酮已显示出对中度致吐刺激有活性,但尚未在顺铂治疗的患者中进行评估。大麻素已被证明对更严重的致吐刺激引起的呕吐有效。然而,在一些研究中,四氢大麻酚疗法因毒性而受到限制。大剂量甲氧氯普胺在少数患者系列中已显示出对顺铂引起的呕吐有疗效。地塞米松作为单一药物的活性存在疑问,但该药物与甲氧氯普胺联合使用时可能会提高疗效。未来,使用作用部位不同且毒性不重叠的抗呕吐药物组合,可能会进一步提高疗效。中枢作用药物如大麻素与多巴胺拮抗剂如甲氧氯普胺或多潘立酮的组合值得评估。预期性恶心和呕吐的控制是另一个主要关注领域,目前尚未进行深入研究。文献中报道了一项单一的比较试验(50),在该研究中评估的是行为疗法而非药物疗法。行为疗法与具有抗焦虑特性的药物如苯二氮䓬类药物和大麻素联合评估可能会有一席之地。最后,具有改善治疗指数的新型抗呕吐药物将受到患者的欢迎。