Dixon R A, Bennett N R, Harrison M J, Kenyon C, Thornton J A
Br J Anaesth. 1980 May;52(5):517-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/52.5.517.
In a randomized cross-over trial in 82 outpatients aged 15-45 yr undergoing conservative dentistry, a solution of flunitrazepam 0.25 mg ml-1 i.v. (average dose 0.014 mg kg-1) was compared with a solution of diazepam 5 mg ml-1 i.v. (0.29 mg kg-1). Cardiovascular changes, operating conditions and side-effects were similar. Forty minutes after the start of injection, about 85% of all patients could not remember the local anaesthetic injection. Thirty minutes after the end of treatment, only 25% of all patients had recovered. One week later, most patients receiving each drug had only vague memories of their treatment; they had felt more relaxed immediately after the i.v. injection than before. Drowsiness was equally common after flunitrazepam and diazepam. Ataxia was more prolonged with flunitrazepam but arm pain and venous thrombophlebitis were less frequent.
在一项针对82名年龄在15至45岁接受保守牙科治疗的门诊患者的随机交叉试验中,将0.25毫克/毫升的氟硝西泮静脉注射液(平均剂量0.014毫克/千克)与5毫克/毫升的地西泮静脉注射液(0.29毫克/千克)进行了比较。心血管变化、手术条件和副作用相似。注射开始后40分钟,约85%的患者记不起局部麻醉注射。治疗结束后30分钟,所有患者中只有25%恢复。一周后,接受每种药物治疗的大多数患者对治疗只有模糊的记忆;他们静脉注射后立即感觉比之前更放松。氟硝西泮和地西泮后嗜睡同样常见。氟硝西泮导致共济失调的时间更长,但手臂疼痛和静脉血栓性静脉炎的发生率较低。