Black N A, Parsons A, Kurtz J B, McWhinney N, Lacey A, Mayon-White R T
Lancet. 1983 Oct 29;2(8357):990-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90979-0.
The effectiveness of two rubella vaccines (RA 27/3 and Cendehill) in women vaccinated post partum was compared. Significantly more women who received RA 27/3 gave satisfactory seroconversion responses than women who received Cendehill (97.6% vs 82.2%). This difference was reflected in the geometric mean titres (43.6 vs 17.0). More women who received RA 27/3 had minor side-effects, but the difference was not significant. The serological response to both vaccines was not affected by the concurrent administration of anti-D immunoglobulin. In view of these findings, the replacement of Cendehill vaccine with RA 27/3 vaccine for women vaccinated post partum should be considered.
对两种风疹疫苗(RA 27/3和Cendehill)在产后接种疫苗的女性中的有效性进行了比较。接种RA 27/3的女性产生满意血清转化反应的人数显著多于接种Cendehill的女性(97.6%对82.2%)。这种差异反映在几何平均滴度上(43.6对17.0)。接种RA 27/3的女性有更多轻微副作用,但差异不显著。两种疫苗的血清学反应均不受同时给予抗-D免疫球蛋白的影响。鉴于这些发现,应考虑用RA 27/3疫苗替代Cendehill疫苗用于产后接种疫苗的女性。