• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部麻醉的镇静作用。静脉注射咪达唑仑与地西泮的比较。

Sedation for local anaesthesia. Comparison of intravenous midazolam and diazepam.

作者信息

Dixon J, Power S J, Grundy E M, Lumley J, Morgan M

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1984 Apr;39(4):372-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb07281.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb07281.x
PMID:6143515
Abstract

Intravenous midazolam and diazepam have been compared as sedatives during surgery performed under local anaesthesia. Satisfactory conditions were produced by both drugs. No difference was detected in the rate of recovery, but a highly significant greater degree of amnesia followed the use of midazolam.

摘要

在局部麻醉下进行的手术中，对静脉注射咪达唑仑和地西泮作为镇静剂进行了比较。两种药物均产生了满意的效果。在恢复速度方面未检测到差异，但使用咪达唑仑后遗忘程度显著更高。

相似文献

1
Sedation for local anaesthesia. Comparison of intravenous midazolam and diazepam.局部麻醉的镇静作用。静脉注射咪达唑仑与地西泮的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1984 Apr;39(4):372-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb07281.x.
2
Comparison of the i.v. administration of midazolam and diazepam as sedation during spinal anaesthesia.脊柱麻醉期间静脉注射咪达唑仑和地西泮作为镇静剂的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Nov;55(11):1089-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.11.1089.
3
Sedation for fibreoptic gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam.
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Apr;55(4):289-96. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.4.289.
4
Midazolam and diazepam compared as sedatives for outpatient surgery under local analgesia.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985 Apr;59(4):349-55. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90056-8.
5
A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Nov;55(11):1095-101. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.11.1095.
6
I.v. sedation for conservative dentistry. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam.用于保守牙科治疗的静脉镇静。咪达唑仑与地西泮的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1986 Apr;58(4):371-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/58.4.371.
7
Comparison of diazepam and midazolam for sedation during local anaesthesia for bronchoscopy.地西泮与咪达唑仑用于支气管镜检查局部麻醉时镇静效果的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1985 Jun;57(6):581-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.6.581.
8
Comparison by means of bispectral index score, between anxiolysis induced by diazepam and sedation induced by midazolam.通过脑电双频指数评分，比较地西泮诱导的抗焦虑作用和咪达唑仑诱导的镇静作用。
Minerva Stomatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;60(7-8):365-81.
9
[Comparative study between midazolam and diazepam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy premedication].咪达唑仑与地西泮在上消化道内镜检查术前用药中的对比研究
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1996 Sep-Dec;16(3):222-7.
10
Haemodynamic changes during induction of anaesthesia with midazolam and diazepam (Valium) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者在使用咪达唑仑和地西泮（安定）诱导麻醉期间的血流动力学变化。
Anaesthesia. 1985 Aug;40(8):767-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb11002.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Anesthetic Features in Diazepam and Midazolam for Sedation Dentistry: A Scoping Review.用于镇静牙科的地西泮和咪达唑仑麻醉特性比较：一项范围综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79079. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79079. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Evaluation of the anxiolytic and amnestic effects of diazepam and midazolam for minor oral surgery.地西泮和咪达唑仑用于小型口腔手术的抗焦虑和遗忘作用评估。
Anesth Prog. 1987 Mar-Apr;34(2):37-42.
3
Recovery following sedation with midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl for outpatient surgery.
门诊手术单独使用咪达唑仑或地西泮镇静，或与芬太尼联合使用后的恢复情况。
Anesth Prog. 1986 Sep-Oct;33(5):230-4.
4
Comparison of the amnesic effects of midazolam and diazepam.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;103(4):545-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02244257.