Schifman R B, Brumbaugh P F, Grover D, Finley P R, Harrow E J
Clin Chem. 1981 Jan;27(1):175-8.
We evaluated the performance of a commercially available cellulose acetate electrophoretic method for quantitating high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (I) in serum by comparing it to a method involving precipitation with dextran sulfate-500/Mg2+. In both methods, enzymic reagents are used for cholesterol measurement. For electrophoretic measurement of I the mean intramembrane CV ws 4.1% (at 220 to 360 mg/L) and the intermembrane CV ranged from 12.2 to 21.0% (at 220 to 880 mg/L). Interassay precision was significantly better for the precipitation method (CV = 3.9% at 390 mg/L). The electrophoretic procedure demonstrated significant measurement bias, both at high and low I concentrations. However, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, measured electrophoretically correlated well with its calculated concentrations obtained by the precipitation method. Measurement of I by this electrophoretic procedure did not achieve the accuracy and reproducibility that have been demonstrated for precipitation methods and that are necessary for reliable clinical interpretation of results for I.
我们通过将一种市售的醋酸纤维素电泳法与一种涉及用硫酸葡聚糖-500/Mg2+沉淀的方法进行比较,评估了该方法对血清中高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(I)进行定量的性能。在这两种方法中,均使用酶试剂进行胆固醇测量。对于I的电泳测量,膜内平均变异系数为4.1%(在220至360mg/L时),膜间变异系数在12.2%至21.0%之间(在220至880mg/L时)。沉淀法的批间精密度明显更好(在390mg/L时变异系数=3.9%)。电泳法在高I浓度和低I浓度下均显示出明显的测量偏差。然而,通过电泳测量的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与其通过沉淀法计算得到的浓度相关性良好。用这种电泳法测量I未达到沉淀法所证明的准确性和可重复性,而这对于I结果的可靠临床解释是必要的。