Miceli G, Silveri M C, Villa G, Caramazza A
Cortex. 1984 Jun;20(2):207-20. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(84)80038-6.
Current theories of agrammatism do not provide a clear explanation for the co-occurrence of omission of grammatical markers and main verbs in this disorder. This study tested the hypothesis that the two symptom features have distinct underlying causes. Specifically, that the omission of main verbs in agrammatic speech is caused, at least in part, by a lexical (as opposed to a syntactic) deficit. Agrammatic and anomic aphasics and normal controls were given an object and action naming test. Agrammatic patients showed a marked impairment in naming actions in contrast to anomic aphasics and normal controls who named actions better than objects. The action naming impairment in agrammatic patients was interpreted as evidence for the lexical deficit hypothesis of verb omission in the speech of these patients and as a demonstration that agrammatism is a heterogeneous disorder that implicates damage to both lexical and syntactic mechanisms.
当前关于语法缺失症的理论并未对该病症中语法标记和主要动词同时缺失的现象给出清晰解释。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即这两种症状特征有着不同的潜在病因。具体而言,语法缺失性言语中主要动词的缺失至少部分是由词汇(而非句法)缺陷导致的。对语法缺失性失语症患者、命名性失语症患者和正常对照组进行了一项物体和动作命名测试。与命名性失语症患者和正常对照组相比,语法缺失性失语症患者在动作命名方面表现出明显受损,而后两者命名动作的能力优于命名物体的能力。语法缺失性失语症患者的动作命名损伤被解释为这些患者言语中动词缺失的词汇缺陷假说的证据,也证明了语法缺失症是一种涉及词汇和句法机制损伤的异质性病症。