Henry R L, Hiller E J, Milner A D, Hodges I G, Stokes G M
Arch Dis Child. 1984 Jan;59(1):54-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.1.54.
In a double blind crossover trial, we compared sodium cromoglycate, ipratropium bromide, and water in 23 asthmatic children less than 2 years old (mean age 11.8 months). Each child received nebulised solutions containing 20 mg of sodium cromoglycate, 250 micrograms of ipratropium bromide, or 2 ml water three times a day for three two month periods. Daily symptom scores did not show significant differences between the treatments but parental preferences indicated that both sodium cromoglycate and ipratropium bromide were superior to placebo. Sodium cromoglycate was prophylactic and was more likely to help the older patients. Ipratropium bromide produced an immediate clinical benefit and the response was not age dependent. We were unable to pick responders from non-responders on the basis of lung function tests performed on a routine outpatient basis. Both ipratropium bromide and sodium cromoglycate help some but not all asthmatic children aged less than 2 years.
在一项双盲交叉试验中,我们对23名2岁以下(平均年龄11.8个月)的哮喘儿童使用色甘酸钠、异丙托溴铵和水进行了比较。每个儿童每天三次雾化吸入含有20毫克色甘酸钠、250微克异丙托溴铵或2毫升水的溶液,为期三个两个月的时间段。每日症状评分在各治疗组之间未显示出显著差异,但家长的偏好表明色甘酸钠和异丙托溴铵均优于安慰剂。色甘酸钠具有预防作用,对年龄较大的患者更有帮助。异丙托溴铵产生了即时的临床益处,且反应与年龄无关。根据常规门诊进行的肺功能测试,我们无法区分有反应者和无反应者。异丙托溴铵和色甘酸钠对部分但并非所有2岁以下的哮喘儿童有帮助。