Vig B K
Hum Genet. 1984;66(2-3):239-43. doi: 10.1007/BF00286609.
The most commonly accepted view about the origin of aneuploidy is that it is due to errors in meiotic division. However, its rare occurrence makes it difficult to explain recurrent births of trisomic children to some parents. This problem causes more serious concern when one accepts that an abnormal (n + 1 or n - 1) sperm would enter fertilization by overriding thousands, or even millions, of normal haploid sperms. Also, the failure of aneuploidy to be induced in the offspring of mammals treated with mutagens raises questions about the effectiveness of the accepted mode of origin of errors. Current concepts also do not explain why one observes more errors of meiotic I, than of meiotic II, origin. It is known that most chromosomes separating at meta-anaphase junction in mitosis follow a nonrandom, genetically controlled sequence of separation. The present proposal makes use of out-of-phase separation of a rare chromosome, like premature separation in mitosis of the X in elderly humans or of an 18 in parents of trisomy 18 children. The suggestion is made that such out-of-phase separation results in aneuploid cell lines by total failure of the centromere to separate or by it separating too early, before the spindle is formed. The prematurely separating centromeres, it appears, do not attach to spindle fibers and hence cause nondisjunction. Such nondisjunction in embryonic stages will produce apparently normal individuals with mosaicism in somatic and/or gametic tissue. An individual carrying mosaicism in gonadal tissue will produce a large number of abnormal gametes, one of which may have a reasonable chance of entering fertilization. This mode of origin of aneuploidy takes care of all questions raised above and finds support in the data available in the literature. Several of the suggestions made in the hypothesis are easily testable.
关于非整倍体的起源,最普遍被接受的观点是它源于减数分裂过程中的错误。然而,其罕见的发生情况使得难以解释某些父母为何会反复生育三体患儿。当人们认为一个异常的(n + 1或n - 1)精子会战胜数千甚至数百万个正常的单倍体精子而进入受精过程时,这个问题就更令人担忧了。此外,用诱变剂处理的哺乳动物后代中未能诱导出非整倍体,这也引发了对公认的错误起源模式有效性的质疑。当前的概念也无法解释为什么观察到减数第一次分裂起源的错误比减数第二次分裂起源的更多。已知在有丝分裂中期 - 后期交界处分离的大多数染色体遵循非随机的、受基因控制的分离顺序。本提议利用了罕见染色体的不同步分离,就像老年人体内X染色体在有丝分裂中的过早分离,或者18三体患儿父母体内18号染色体的过早分离。有人提出,这种不同步分离会由于着丝粒完全不分离或在纺锤体形成之前过早分离而导致非整倍体细胞系的产生。似乎过早分离的着丝粒不会附着在纺锤体纤维上,因此会导致不分离。胚胎阶段的这种不分离会产生在体细胞和/或配子组织中具有嵌合现象的明显正常个体。在性腺组织中携带嵌合现象的个体将产生大量异常配子,其中之一可能有合理的机会进入受精过程。这种非整倍体的起源模式解决了上述所有问题,并在文献中的现有数据中得到了支持。该假设中提出的几个建议很容易得到验证。