van Buggenhout E, Ketelaer P, Carton H
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1982;84(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/0303-8467(82)90105-6.
The value of visual, brain stem auditory and somatosensory potentials in detecting clinical and subclinical lesions as compared to the routine neurological, ophthalmological and vestibular examinations was investigated in 100 M.S. patients. It would appear that the VEP and SEP are far superior to the routine techniques in demonstrating lesions. On the other hand, the BAEP is inferior to the clinical and vestibular test as an indicator of brain stem lesions. All clinically manifest posterior column lesions are associated with abnormal SEP. However a substantial proportion of clinically evident lesions in the visual pathways or the midbrain and pons are not detectable by the VEP and BAEP.
在100例多发性硬化症患者中，研究了视觉、脑干听觉和体感诱发电位在检测临床和亚临床病变方面与常规神经学、眼科和前庭检查相比的价值。看来，视觉诱发电位（VEP）和体感诱发电位（SEP）在显示病变方面远比常规技术优越。另一方面，作为脑干病变的指标，脑干听觉诱发电位（BAEP）不如临床和前庭检查。所有临床表现为后柱病变的患者均伴有体感诱发电位异常。然而，相当一部分视觉通路、中脑和脑桥的临床明显病变无法通过视觉诱发电位和脑干听觉诱发电位检测到。
