Kjaer M
Acta Neurol Scand. 1980 Oct;62(4):220-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1980.tb03029.x.
Cervical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) following electrical stimulation of the median nerve and blink reflexes (BR) following electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve were recorded in 30 normal subjects aged 20-49 years. Subjects aged 40-49 had longer SEP latencies than subjects aged 20-39 years. A total of 29 slightly affected patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) aged 26-49 years, including four patients without clinical signs (suspected MS) and 19 patients with signs indicating only one lesion (possible MS) were examined by low-rate random-stimulated brain stem auditory (BAEP), checkerboard pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP), SEP and BR. Abnormal recordings by at least one of the examinations were found in all but three patients, and by all four tests in five patients. In patients with definite or probably MS, demonstration of clinically recognized or subclinical lesions was of minor diagnostic value, in contrast to the importance such findings had in patients with suspected or possible MS. Silent lesions were shown by at least one of the tests in the four suspected and in 13 of the possible MS patients, so these 17 patients could be transferred to a more certain diagnostic category. This reclassification was most often due to the BAEP recording. In patients with spinal signs, the combination of BAEP and VEP recording was sufficiently efficient. In patients with optic neuritis a combination of BAEP and SEP was preferred. No abnormal recordings were found in 15 normal subjects examined by all four tests.
对30名年龄在20至49岁的正常受试者进行了记录,分别是正中神经电刺激后的颈段和皮质体感诱发电位(SEP)以及眶上神经电刺激后的瞬目反射(BR)。40至49岁的受试者SEP潜伏期比20至39岁的受试者更长。对29名年龄在26至49岁、患有轻度多发性硬化(MS)的患者进行了检查,其中包括4名无临床体征的患者(疑似MS)和19名仅有一个病灶体征的患者(可能MS),检查项目包括低速率随机刺激脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)、棋盘格图形翻转视觉诱发电位(VEP)、SEP和BR。除3名患者外,其他患者至少有一项检查记录异常,5名患者四项检查均异常。与疑似或可能患有MS的患者相比,在确诊或可能患有MS的患者中,临床上已确认或亚临床病灶的显示对诊断价值较小。在4名疑似MS患者和13名可能患有MS的患者中,至少有一项检查显示存在无症状病灶,因此这17名患者可被归为更明确的诊断类别。这种重新分类最常见的原因是BAEP记录。对于有脊髓体征的患者,BAEP和VEP记录相结合的方法足够有效。对于患有视神经炎的患者,首选BAEP和SEP相结合的方法。在接受四项检查的15名正常受试者中未发现异常记录。