Reynolds D J, Chasey D, Scott A C, Bridger J C
Vet Rec. 1984 Apr 21;114(16):397-401. doi: 10.1136/vr.114.16.397.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was compared with electron microscopy in the examination of faeces from experimental calves and showed 100 per cent agreement in the detection of 19 bovine coronavirus and 15 bovine rotavirus electron microscope positive samples. In a limited field survey of calf diarrhoea 75 selected faeces were examined independently by ELISA and electron microscopy and the agreement between the two tests was 95 per cent for coronavirus and 84 per cent for rotavirus. A further comparison was made with 74 samples submitted for routine diagnosis and this yielded agreements of 82 per cent (coronavirus) and 89 per cent (rotavirus). Factors contributing to discrepant results were examined and the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two tests for routine detection of these enteric viruses are discussed.
在对实验小牛粪便的检测中,将酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)与电子显微镜检查进行了比较,结果显示在检测19份牛冠状病毒和15份牛轮状病毒电子显微镜阳性样本时,二者的检测结果完全一致。在一项针对小牛腹泻的有限现场调查中,对75份选定的粪便样本分别采用ELISA和电子显微镜进行独立检测,两种检测方法对冠状病毒检测结果的一致性为95%,对轮状病毒检测结果的一致性为84%。又对74份提交进行常规诊断的样本进行了进一步比较,结果显示两种检测方法对冠状病毒检测结果的一致性为82%,对轮状病毒检测结果的一致性为89%。对导致结果不一致的因素进行了研究,并讨论了这两种检测方法在常规检测这些肠道病毒方面的相对优缺点。