Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑和脂肪乳剂地西泮作为肌肉注射术前用药:一项双盲临床试验

Midazolam and fat-emulsion diazepam as intramuscular premedication. A double-blind clinical trial.

作者信息

Mattila M A, Suurinkeroinen S, Säilä K, Himberg J J

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1983 Oct;27(5):345-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1983.tb01965.x.

Abstract

Sixty female patients were given, in random order, under double-blind conditions, either midazolam or fat-emulsion diazepam, intramuscularly, as premedication, 1 h before general anaesthesia. The dose of midazolam used was 0.13 mg/kg and that of diazepam 0.17 mg/kg. The degree of sedation, mood of the patient, and time at which onset of effect was perceptible were assessed before induction of anaesthesia, together with skin temperature and concentrations of midazolam or diazepam in plasma. Patients were interviewed postoperatively to discover their subjective evaluation of the premedication and to assess its amnesic effects. Midazolam was significantly superior (P less than 0.05) to diazepam as regards sedation. There were no differences in effects on mood of the patients between the two groups. Sixteen patients in the diazepam group and four in the midazolam group had no perception of onset of effect. The difference is significant (P less than 0.01). The skin temperature was, on average, 2 degrees C higher in the midazolam group than in the diazepam group (P less than 0.005). The mean plasma concentration was 67.8 +/- 24.5 micrograms/l in the midazolam group and 44.8 +/- 25.7 micrograms/l in the diazepam group. In only two cases was the concentration of diazepam above 100 micrograms/l (arbitrarily defined as the minimum sedative concentration). Subjective evaluation of efficacy significantly (P less than 0.002) favoured midazolam. Local pain was evident in two patients in the diazepam group, and three patients experienced nausea immediately after administration of the drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

60名女性患者在双盲条件下被随机给予咪达唑仑或脂肪乳剂地西泮,于全身麻醉前1小时肌肉注射作为术前用药。所用咪达唑仑剂量为0.13mg/kg,地西泮剂量为0.17mg/kg。在麻醉诱导前评估镇静程度、患者情绪、起效时间,同时测量皮肤温度以及血浆中咪达唑仑或地西泮的浓度。术后对患者进行访谈,了解他们对术前用药的主观评价并评估其遗忘效果。在镇静方面,咪达唑仑显著优于地西泮(P<0.05)。两组对患者情绪的影响无差异。地西泮组有16名患者、咪达唑仑组有4名患者未感觉到起效。差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。咪达唑仑组的皮肤温度平均比地西泮组高2℃(P<0.005)。咪达唑仑组的平均血浆浓度为67.8±24.5μg/L,地西泮组为44.8±25.7μg/L。仅2例地西泮浓度超过100μg/L(任意定义为最低镇静浓度)。在疗效的主观评价上,咪达唑仑明显更受青睐(P<0.002)。地西泮组有2例患者出现局部疼痛,3例患者用药后立即出现恶心。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验