Kakaiya R M, Gudino M D, Miller W V, Sherman L A, Katz A J, Wakem C J, Krugman D J, Klatsky A U, Kiraly T R
Transfusion. 1984 Jan-Feb;24(1):35-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1984.24184122559.x.
We employed four crossmatch techniques to select platelet donors for refractory patients. Forty-four donor-recipient pairs were studied in 32 patients. Analysis of effectiveness of platelet transfusions revealed that only 18 percent of transfusions gave a borderline response; the remainder were either effective or not effective at all. The corrected predictive values of three crossmatch tests were as follows: enzyme-linked immuno-specific assay, 81 percent; platelet immunofluorescence test, 73 percent; and lymphocytotoxicity, 70 percent (p greater than 0.05). The predictive value of these tests did not differ in HLA-matched versus unmatched platelet transfusions. Donor selection by lymphocytotoxicity compatibility did not appear to be useful if donors were selected by either of the other two methods. The fourth test, antiglobulin-modified lymphocytotoxicity, offered no advantage over lymphocytotoxicity. Our data suggest that platelet crossmatching assays are a useful adjunct to the selection process for the platelet donor in addition to ABO, Rh, and HLA matching.
我们采用了四种交叉配型技术为难治性患者选择血小板供体。对32例患者中的44对供受者进行了研究。血小板输注有效性分析显示,只有18%的输注产生临界反应;其余的要么有效,要么完全无效。三种交叉配型试验的校正预测值如下:酶联免疫特异性测定法为81%;血小板免疫荧光试验为73%;淋巴细胞毒性试验为70%(p>0.05)。这些试验在HLA配型和未配型的血小板输注中的预测值没有差异。如果通过其他两种方法之一选择供体,那么通过淋巴细胞毒性相容性选择供体似乎没有用处。第四种试验,抗球蛋白修饰的淋巴细胞毒性试验,与淋巴细胞毒性试验相比没有优势。我们的数据表明,除了ABO、Rh和HLA配型外,血小板交叉配型检测是血小板供体选择过程中的一种有用辅助手段。