Larson D M, Fujiwara K, Alexander R W, Gimbrone M A
Lab Invest. 1984 Apr;50(4):401-7.
Rabbit antisera elicited against purified human nonmuscle (platelet) and smooth muscle (uterine myometrium) myosins identified distinct species of myosin when frozen sections of a variety of mammalian tissues were examined by immunofluorescence microscopy. Antiplatelet myosin antiserum specifically stained several nonmuscle cell types including epithelial, some connective tissue, and all vascular endothelial (arterial, venous, capillary) cells. Antismooth muscle myosin antiserum stained only smooth muscle and no other cell types. Neither antiserum reacted with rat cardiac (ventricular) or skeletal muscle cells. Antismooth muscle myosin antiserum staining was detectable in medial vascular smooth muscle in all vessels examined from rat, bovine, human, and guinea pig sources (including elastic and muscular arteries, arterioles, venules, and veins). Although antiplatelet myosin antiserum did not stain nonvascular smooth muscle or vascular smooth muscle in muscular arteries, arterioles, venules, or veins, it did uniformly and specifically stain medial vascular smooth muscle in elastic arteries. This staining of elastic arteries was abolished by absorption of antiplatelet myosin antiserum with purified platelet myosin but not uterine myosin. Similarly, the reactivity of antismooth muscle myosin antiserum was abolished by incubation with uterine but not platelet myosin. The differences in staining patterns observed with antiplatelet myosin antiserum and antismooth muscle myosin antiserum in elastic arteries versus other blood vessels suggests a heterogeneity of antigenic expression in vascular smooth muscle myosin. The most likely explanations for this heterogeneity are the presence of different gene products (myosin isozymes) or a posttranslational alteration (possibly conformational) of a single myosin species. Heterogeneity in this important component of the contractile apparatus of vascular smooth muscle may have significant implications for the physiology and pathophysiology of the vessel wall.
当通过免疫荧光显微镜检查多种哺乳动物组织的冰冻切片时,针对纯化的人非肌肉(血小板)和平滑肌(子宫肌层)肌球蛋白产生的兔抗血清鉴定出了不同种类的肌球蛋白。抗血小板肌球蛋白抗血清特异性地染色了几种非肌肉细胞类型,包括上皮细胞、一些结缔组织细胞以及所有血管内皮(动脉、静脉、毛细血管)细胞。抗平滑肌肌球蛋白抗血清仅对平滑肌染色,而不对其他细胞类型染色。两种抗血清均不与大鼠心肌(心室)或骨骼肌细胞反应。在从大鼠、牛、人及豚鼠来源检查的所有血管(包括弹性动脉和肌性动脉、小动脉、小静脉和静脉)的中膜血管平滑肌中,均可检测到抗平滑肌肌球蛋白抗血清染色。尽管抗血小板肌球蛋白抗血清不染色肌性动脉、小动脉、小静脉或静脉中的非血管平滑肌或血管平滑肌,但它确实均匀且特异性地染色了弹性动脉中的中膜血管平滑肌。通过用纯化的血小板肌球蛋白而非子宫肌球蛋白吸收抗血小板肌球蛋白抗血清,可消除弹性动脉的这种染色。同样,通过与子宫肌球蛋白而非血小板肌球蛋白孵育,可消除抗平滑肌肌球蛋白抗血清的反应性。在弹性动脉与其他血管中,抗血小板肌球蛋白抗血清和抗平滑肌肌球蛋白抗血清观察到的染色模式差异表明血管平滑肌肌球蛋白抗原表达存在异质性。对此异质性最可能的解释是存在不同的基因产物(肌球蛋白同工酶)或单一肌球蛋白种类的翻译后改变(可能是构象改变)。血管平滑肌收缩装置这一重要组成部分的异质性可能对血管壁的生理学和病理生理学具有重要意义。