• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的商业系统的比较。

A comparison of four commercial systems for the identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.

作者信息

Burdash N M, Bannister E R, Manos J P, West M E

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Apr;73(4):564-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/73.4.564.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/73.4.564
PMID:6989231
Abstract

Four commercial systems for the identification of glucose nonfermentative, gram-negative bacilli and the conventional system used in our laboratory were compared. The API 20E, Roche Oxi/Ferm Tube, BBL Minitek, Flow N/F System, and our system were compared for accuracy, time needed for identification and number of isolates needing additional testing. A total of 241 different isolates were used. The API 20E identified 86.7% correctly; Oxi/FermTube, 83.0%; Minitek, 93.4%; N/F System, 90.5%; and our system, 90.0%. Within 24 hours after isolation, the API 20E identified 25.7%; Oxi/Ferm Tube and Minitek, 0%; N/F System 27.3%; and our system, 35.7%. After 48 hours, the API 20E identified 74.7%; Oxi/Ferm Tube, 35.7%; Minitek, 45.2%; N/F System, 83.0%; and our system, 94.6%. The number of isolates that required additional testing for identification by the API 20E was 119; Oxi/Ferm Tube, 161; Minitek, 88; N/F System, 43; and our system, 36. Ease of performance, technologist time, and level of identification required by individual laboratories are discussed.

摘要

比较了用于鉴定葡萄糖非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的四种商业系统以及我们实验室使用的传统系统。对API 20E、罗氏Oxi/Ferm管、BBL Minitek、Flow N/F系统和我们的系统进行了准确性、鉴定所需时间以及需要额外测试的分离株数量方面的比较。共使用了241种不同的分离株。API 20E的正确鉴定率为86.7%;Oxi/Ferm管为83.0%;Minitek为93.4%;N/F系统为90.5%;我们的系统为90.0%。分离后24小时内,API 20E鉴定出25.7%;Oxi/Ferm管和Minitek为0%;N/F系统为27.3%;我们的系统为35.7%。48小时后,API 20E鉴定出74.7%;Oxi/Ferm管为35.7%;Minitek为45.2%;N/F系统为83.0%;我们的系统为94.6%。需要通过API 20E进行额外测试以鉴定的分离株数量为119株;Oxi/Ferm管为161株;Minitek为88株;N/F系统为43株;我们的系统为36株。还讨论了操作的简易性、技术人员时间以及各个实验室所需的鉴定水平。

相似文献

1
A comparison of four commercial systems for the identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.四种用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的商业系统的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Apr;73(4):564-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/73.4.564.
2
Identification of Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella haemolytica by API 20E, Minitek, and Oxi/Ferm systems.采用API 20E、Minitek和Oxi/Ferm系统鉴定多杀性巴氏杆菌和溶血巴氏杆菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):433-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.433-437.1981.
3
Use of the API 20E, Oxi/Ferm, and Minitek systems to identify nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria: seven years of experience.使用API 20E、Oxi/Ferm和Minitek系统鉴定非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌:七年经验
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Sep;1(3):241-56. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90024-x.
4
Comparison of the API 20E and Oxi/Ferm systems in identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria.API 20E系统与Oxi/Ferm系统在鉴定非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌中的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):220-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.220-226.1979.
5
Comparison of the Oxi/Ferm and N/F systems for identification of infrequently encountered nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacilli.用于鉴定罕见非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌的Oxi/Ferm系统与N/F系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):384-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.384-390.1982.
6
The N/F and Oxi/Ferm systems for identification of oxidative-fermentative Gram-negative rods: a comparative study.用于鉴定氧化发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的N/F和Oxi/Ferm系统:一项比较研究。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1982 Oct;90(5):341-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00129.x.
7
Nonfermentative bacilli: evaluation of three systems for identification.非发酵杆菌:三种鉴定系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):147-54. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.147-154.1979.
8
Evaluation of the Oxi/Ferm tube system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli.用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的Oxi/Ferm管系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):533-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.533-538.1978.
9
Four methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermenting rods: organisms more commonly encountered in clinical specimens.革兰阴性非发酵菌的四种鉴定方法:临床标本中更常见的微生物
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Aug;12(2):271-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.2.271-278.1980.
10
Accuracy and reproducibility of the Oxi/Ferm system in identifying a select group of unusual gram-negative bacilli.Oxi/Ferm系统在鉴定一组特定的罕见革兰氏阴性杆菌中的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):180-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.180-185.1979.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of four commercial systems for identification of Burkholderia cepacia and other gram-negative nonfermenting bacilli recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis.四种商业系统对从囊性纤维化患者中分离出的洋葱伯克霍尔德菌和其他革兰氏阴性非发酵杆菌进行鉴定的准确性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Apr;34(4):886-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.886-891.1996.
2
Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.用于鉴定葡萄糖非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的自动微生物系统评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):302-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.302-307.1982.
3
Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of nonfermentative and nonenteric fermentative Gram-negative bacteria.
用于鉴定非发酵及非肠道发酵革兰氏阴性菌的Minitek系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):509-16. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.509-516.1980.
4
Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by pyocyanin production on Tech agar.通过在Tech琼脂上产生绿脓菌素鉴定铜绿假单胞菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):456-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.456-458.1981.
5
Comparison of the AutoMicrobic system and a conventional tube system for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli.自动微生物鉴定系统与传统试管系统用于非发酵及氧化酶阳性革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):25-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.25-27.1982.
6
Evaluation of the rapid NFT system for identification of gram-negative, nonfermenting rods.用于鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的快速NFT系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):730-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.730-734.1984.