Welch W D, Layman M A, Southern P M
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 May;81(5):629-33. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.5.629.
The authors have evaluated the MS-2 (Abbott) and Lumac (3M) systems for the rapid screening of urine specimens for bacteriuria. These systems, which can detect significant levels of microorganisms in urine in five hours (MS-2) or 30 minutes (Lumac), were compared with a standard overnight plate culture method. Three hundred fifty-eight voided urine specimens were examined. The two systems compared equally at greater than 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL in terms of false-positive results (11%), false-negative results (2%), sensitivity (98%), specificity (approximately equal to 86%), and positive predictive value (98%), although the Lumac was found to have a lower negative predictive value (by 10%) than the MS-2. The only organism not recognized by the MS-2 at greater than 10(5) CFU/mL was a Lactobacillus; whereas the only specimens missed by the Lumac at greater than 10(5) CFU/mL were two pure cultures of Escherichia coli. At counts of greater than 10(4) to 10(5) CFU/mL, both systems missed numerous (15 of 21 isolates for the MS-2; 12 of 9 isolates for the Lumac) gram-positive cocci. The Lumac system was the most costly, being 3.6 times as expensive as the standard plate method. Although both systems greatly reduce the time required to process urine specimens, the large number of false-positive results, false-negative results at greater than 10(4) to 10(5) CFU/mL, as well as cost suggest that a careful evaluation of a laboratory's specific needs for urine cultures be made to determine whether or not such rapid urine screening systems are appropriate.
作者评估了MS - 2(雅培公司)和Lumac(3M公司)系统用于快速筛查尿标本中的菌尿症。这些系统能在5小时(MS - 2)或30分钟(Lumac)内检测出尿液中显著水平的微生物,将它们与标准的过夜平板培养法进行了比较。共检查了358份随机尿标本。在菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL大于10⁵时,这两种系统在假阳性结果(11%)、假阴性结果(2%)、敏感性(98%)、特异性(约86%)和阳性预测值(98%)方面表现相当,不过发现Lumac的阴性预测值比MS - 2低10%。在CFU/mL大于10⁵时,MS - 2唯一未识别出的微生物是乳酸杆菌;而Lumac在CFU/mL大于10⁵时唯一漏检的标本是两份大肠杆菌纯培养物。在CFU/mL大于10⁴至10⁵时,两种系统都漏检了许多革兰氏阳性球菌(MS - 2漏检21株分离菌中的15株;Lumac漏检9株分离菌中的12株)。Lumac系统成本最高,是标准平板法的3.6倍。尽管两种系统都大大减少了处理尿标本所需的时间,但大量的假阳性结果、CFU/mL大于10⁴至10⁵时的假阴性结果以及成本表明,需要仔细评估实验室对尿培养的具体需求,以确定此类快速尿筛查系统是否适用。