Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M
J Clin Oncol. 1984 May;2(5):472-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.5.472.
The classical criteria for the evaluation of clinical trials in cancer reflect alterations in physical well-being, but are insensitive to other important factors, such as psychosocial state, sociability, and somatic sensation that may play a critical role in determining the patients' functional response to their illness and its treatment. The Functional Living Index-Cancer is designed for easy, repeated patient self-administration. It is a 22-item questionnaire that has been validated on 837 patients in two cities over a three-year period. Criteria for validity include stability of factor analysis, concurrent validation studies against the Karnofsky, Beck Depression, Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety, and Katz Activities of Daily Living scales, as well as the scaled version of The General Health Questionnaire and The McGill/ Melzack Pain Index. The index is uncontaminated by social desirability issues. The validation studies demonstrate the lack of correlation between traditional measures of patient response and other significant functional factors such as depression and anxiety (r = 0.33), sociability and family interaction, and nausea. These findings elucidate the frequently observed discrepancies between traditional assessments of clinical response and overall functional patient outcome. The index is proposed as an adjunct to clinical trials assessment and may provide additional patient functional information on which to analyse the outcome of clinical trials or offer specific advice to individual patients.
评估癌症临床试验的经典标准反映了身体状况的变化,但对其他重要因素不敏感,如心理社会状态、社交能力和躯体感觉,这些因素在确定患者对疾病及其治疗的功能反应中可能起关键作用。癌症功能生活指数旨在方便患者反复自行填写。它是一份包含22个条目的问卷,在三年时间里对两个城市的837名患者进行了验证。有效性标准包括因子分析的稳定性、与卡诺夫斯基量表、贝克抑郁量表、斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑量表和特质焦虑量表、卡茨日常生活活动量表以及一般健康问卷的量表版本和麦吉尔/梅尔扎克疼痛指数的同时效度研究。该指数不受社会期望问题的影响。效度研究表明,患者反应的传统测量方法与其他重要功能因素之间缺乏相关性,如抑郁和焦虑(r = 0.33)、社交能力和家庭互动以及恶心。这些发现阐明了临床反应的传统评估与患者整体功能结果之间经常观察到的差异。该指数被提议作为临床试验评估的辅助工具,可能会提供额外的患者功能信息,以便分析临床试验结果或为个体患者提供具体建议。