Hohler C W
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jun;27(2):314-26. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198406000-00007.
Many ultrasonologists feel that if they are unable to obtain a BPD measurement at the time of an ultrasound examination that they have somehow failed to do an adequate job. However, from the information outlined in this chapter, it can be seen that the biparietal diameter is only one measurement that can be taken of the fetus in order to estimate gestational age. Furthermore, since the recognition of variability in fetal head shape, absolute reliance on measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter for estimation of gestational age has become much less common, especially after 20 weeks of gestation. The move toward measurement of several parts of the fetal anatomy has been called fetal biometry. The purpose of this approach is to evaluate body proportion and symmetry of growth of different organ systems, in the hope of elucidating subtle patterns which might be recognized as abnormal in very early stages when some form of prenatal management might improve reproductive outcome. Simultaneously, with the implementation of this approach to estimating age, a desire to inject an element of "quality control" into the obstetric ultrasound examination has come about. It has been found that measurement of more than one fetal parameter, in a sense, prevents overreliance on any single measurement, which, by itself, might mislead the clinician. While an error of clinically significant magnitude can be made in any measurement, it is unlikely that an error of the same magnitude, in "the same direction" of over or underestimation of the actual, would occur. Thus, there is an element of protection of the patient built into this approach which makes it appealing intuitively. However, it is uncertain that measurement of BPD, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length will, in all cases, give a better estimate of gestational age than will measurement of the BPD alone. Recent data from Hadlock et al. showed that in 177 normal pregnancies, there was significant improvement in the ultrasound estimation of estimated date of delivery when two or more parameters were used to make that estimate rather than just BPD alone. Prior to 36 weeks, the optimal combination of parameters included the biparietal diameter, the abdominal circumference, and the femur length. However, after 36 weeks, the head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length gave the best estimate, with significant reduction in the mean errors, standard deviations, and size of maximum errors. Thus, it appears that the estimate using MFGP is both more accurate and precise than a single measurement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
许多超声科医生认为,如果在超声检查时无法获得双顶径测量值,那他们就多少没有做好本职工作。然而,从本章概述的信息可以看出,双顶径只是为了估算孕周而对胎儿进行测量的一项指标。此外,自从认识到胎儿头部形状存在变异性以来,完全依赖胎儿双顶径测量来估算孕周的情况已变得不那么常见,尤其是在妊娠20周之后。转向对胎儿身体多个部位进行测量的做法被称为胎儿生物测量。这种方法的目的是评估身体比例以及不同器官系统生长的对称性,以期在某些形式的产前管理可能改善生殖结局的非常早期阶段,就能识别出可能被视为异常的细微模式。同时,随着这种估算孕周方法的实施,人们产生了在产科超声检查中引入“质量控制”因素的愿望。已经发现,从某种意义上说,测量多个胎儿参数可防止过度依赖任何单一测量值,因为单一测量值本身可能会误导临床医生。虽然任何测量都可能出现具有临床显著意义的误差,但不太可能出现朝着高估或低估实际值的“相同方向”出现相同幅度误差的情况。因此,这种方法内在地包含了对患者的一种保护因素,这使其在直觉上颇具吸引力。然而,尚不确定在所有情况下,测量双顶径、头围、腹围和股骨长度是否会比仅测量双顶径能更好地估算孕周。哈德洛克等人最近的数据表明,在177例正常妊娠中,使用两个或更多参数而非仅用双顶径来估算预产期时,超声估算有显著改善。在36周之前,最佳参数组合包括双顶径、腹围和股骨长度。然而,在36周之后,头围、腹围和股骨长度给出了最佳估算值,平均误差、标准差和最大误差的大小均显著降低。因此,似乎使用多参数生长法进行的估算比单一测量更准确、更精确。(摘要截选至400字)