McMichael A J, Jensen O M, Parkin D M, Zaridze D G
Epidemiol Rev. 1984;6:192-216. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036271.
Recent questions about the role of cholesterol (particularly blood cholesterol) in human cancer have assumed considerable scientific and public health importance. This paper has reviewed the evidence relating human cancer to cholesterol, in diet, blood, and feces. With respect to dietary cholesterol, there is moderately consistent evidence, both descriptive and analytic, of a small-to-medium increase in risk of cancers of the colon and female breast in association with increased dietary cholesterol. However, the close correlation of cholesterol with other foods and nutrients precludes causal inference. The association of fecal cholesterol with large bowel cancer, in both descriptive and analytic studies, is inconsistent. However, there is some evidence that individuals with reduced degradation of fecal cholesterol are at increased risk of colon cancer. Other bile-derived fecal components, particularly the acid sterols, show a somewhat more consistent relationship with large bowel cancer. It may be of relevance to the findings on blood cholesterol that bile is produced from hepatic cholesterol which derives, in part, from blood cholesterol. Studies of blood cholesterol and cancer have been either experimental (intervention) or observational (primarily follow-up). Deliberate lowering of blood cholesterol, by either drugs or diet, does not appear to alter the risk of cancer, either overall or of specific types. The findings from 20 published follow-up studies, each initiated as a cardiovascular disease study, have been more varied. In 12 studies, an inverse association was observed between blood cholesterol level and overall cancer risk. Eight of those 12 were mortality studies, and in six, the inverse association was confined to deaths that occurred early in follow-up; this observation is consistent with lowered blood cholesterol having occurred as a metabolic response to a preclinical cancer. However, the results of the other two mortality studies do not exclusively support this interpretation. Furthermore, in three of the four incidence studies that reported an inverse association, the inverse association persisted for 10 or more years. This relationship was most marked for colon cancer in men and showed some evidence of being maximal in the proximal colon. The biologic plausibility of these particular observations on colon cancer risk in relationship to an antecedent naturally occurring low blood cholesterol gains some support from a body of epidemiologic, clinical, and experimental evidence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
近期有关胆固醇(尤其是血液中的胆固醇)在人类癌症中作用的问题已具有相当重要的科学和公共卫生意义。本文回顾了饮食、血液和粪便中胆固醇与人类癌症相关的证据。关于膳食胆固醇,描述性和分析性研究均有适度一致的证据表明,膳食胆固醇增加与结肠癌和女性乳腺癌风险有中到小幅度的上升相关。然而,胆固醇与其他食物和营养素的密切关联排除了因果推断。在描述性和分析性研究中,粪便胆固醇与大肠癌的关联并不一致。不过,有一些证据表明粪便胆固醇降解减少的个体患结肠癌的风险增加。其他胆汁衍生的粪便成分,特别是酸性固醇,与大肠癌的关系更为一致。胆汁由肝脏胆固醇产生,而肝脏胆固醇部分来源于血液胆固醇,这可能与血液胆固醇的研究结果相关。血液胆固醇与癌症的研究要么是实验性(干预性)的,要么是观察性(主要是随访)的。通过药物或饮食刻意降低血液胆固醇,似乎并不会改变总体或特定类型癌症的风险。20项已发表的随访研究(每项研究最初都是作为心血管疾病研究启动的)结果更为多样。在12项研究中,观察到血液胆固醇水平与总体癌症风险呈负相关。这12项研究中有8项是死亡率研究,其中6项中,负相关仅限于随访早期发生的死亡;这一观察结果与血液胆固醇降低是对临床前癌症的代谢反应一致。然而,另外两项死亡率研究的结果并不完全支持这一解释。此外,在报告有负相关的四项发病率研究中的三项中,负相关持续了10年或更长时间。这种关系在男性结肠癌中最为明显,并且有一些证据表明在近端结肠中最为显著。这些关于结肠癌风险与先前自然发生的低血液胆固醇关系的特定观察结果的生物学合理性,从一系列流行病学、临床和实验证据中获得了一些支持。(摘要截断于400字)