Zahar A R
Bull World Health Organ. 1984;62 Suppl(Suppl):89-100.
In order to define the scope of vector control as a component of malaria control in the WHO African Region, examples of recent experiences with different vector control methods in this region are reviewed. Residual house spraying applied alone or in combination with mass drug administration has failed to interrupt malaria transmission in savanna areas for several technical and administrative reasons. Nevertheless, there is evidence that residual house spraying has led to an improvement in general health. However, the existence of DDT and dieldrin/HCH and lately malathion resistance in the Sudan in Anopheles gambiae s.l. would militate against the use of residual house spraying as a main tool for long-term malaria control. It should therefore be used only to reduce malaria prevalence to an acceptable level until integrated control methods can be developed and become operational.Experience with larval control, space spraying, and biological control of vectors is also reviewed, and the value of self-help methods of reducing man-vector contact under African conditions is examined. All these methods need to be more thoroughly assessed. Several proposals are made for applied field research.
为界定病媒控制作为世卫组织非洲区域疟疾控制组成部分的范围,本文回顾了该区域近期不同病媒控制方法的经验实例。由于若干技术和行政原因,单独使用或与大规模药物管理相结合的室内滞留喷洒未能在稀树草原地区阻断疟疾传播。然而,有证据表明室内滞留喷洒已使总体健康状况得到改善。然而,苏丹冈比亚按蚊复合体内存在滴滴涕、狄氏剂/六氯环己烷以及最近的马拉硫磷抗性,这将不利于把室内滞留喷洒用作长期疟疾控制的主要工具。因此,在能够开发并实施综合控制方法之前,仅应使用室内滞留喷洒将疟疾流行率降至可接受水平。本文还回顾了幼虫控制、空间喷洒和病媒生物控制的经验,并审视了在非洲条件下减少人与病媒接触的自助方法的价值。所有这些方法都需要进行更全面的评估。本文提出了若干应用领域研究的建议。