Mimouni M, Galatzer A, Madanes L, Lew E, Doron M, Laron Z
Isr J Med Sci. 1978 Mar;14(3):319-23.
The blood glucose of 271 diabetic subjects (140 boys and 131 girls), followed in a diabetes clinic, was determined by three methods: 1) Reflectance Meter (Ames), 2) Eyetone (Ames), and 3) AutoAnalyzer (Technicon). The results were statistically analyzed at four blood glucose concentration ranges (less than 100, 100 to 200, 201 to 300 and greater than 300 mg/dl). The Eyetone instrument and the Reflectance Meter were found to be simple and exact methods for instant glucose determination as compared with the standard AutoAnalyzer technique. The Reflectance Meter was inexact in the blood glucose range of 201 to 300 mg/dl. The Eyetone instrument was reliable within the range of 10 to 400 mg/dl and was found to be useful for quick glucose determination in the clinic or home.
在一家糖尿病诊所对271名糖尿病患者(140名男孩和131名女孩)进行随访,采用三种方法测定血糖:1)反射仪(艾姆斯公司),2)眼内血糖仪(艾姆斯公司),3)自动分析仪(泰康公司)。在四个血糖浓度范围(低于100、100至200、201至300以及高于300mg/dl)对结果进行了统计学分析。与标准的自动分析仪技术相比,发现眼内血糖仪和反射仪是用于即时血糖测定的简单且准确的方法。反射仪在201至300mg/dl的血糖范围内不准确。眼内血糖仪在10至400mg/dl范围内可靠,且发现其可用于诊所或家中的快速血糖测定。