Friedly G, Zartarian M V, Wood J C, Floyd C M, Peterson E M, de la Maza L M
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):775-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.775-778.1983.
Sera from 290 hospital patients were tested to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the hemagglutination treponemal test for syphilis (HATTS) with the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS). Complete agreement was obtained between the methods when 142 syphilitic sera from patients with various stages of syphilis were tested. By using clinical histories, the specificity with 148 nonsyphilitic sera was determined to be 100% for the HATTS and 96.6% (143 of 148) for the FTA-ABS. Satisfactory reproducibility was obtained with both methods. Compared with the FTA-ABS, the HATTS was more specific, easier, and more economical to perform. We therefore recommend the HATTS as a suitable alternative to the FTA-ABS.
检测了290名医院患者的血清,以比较梅毒血凝密螺旋体试验(HATTS)与荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA - ABS)的敏感性、特异性和可重复性。对142份来自不同梅毒阶段患者的梅毒血清进行检测时,两种方法结果完全一致。根据临床病史,对于148份非梅毒血清,HATTS的特异性为100%,FTA - ABS的特异性为96.6%(148份中的143份)。两种方法均具有良好的可重复性。与FTA - ABS相比,HATTS特异性更高,操作更简便且更经济。因此,我们推荐HATTS作为FTA - ABS的合适替代方法。