Hypocapnia and sustained hypoxia blunt ventilation on arrival at high altitude.

Hypoxia at high altitude stimulates ventilation, but inhibitory influences in the first days after arrival limit the ventilatory response. Possible inhibitory influences include hypocapnia and depression of ventilation during sustained hypoxia. Our approach was to compare hypoxic ventilatory responses at low altitude with ventilation at high altitude. In 12 subjects we compared responses both to isocapnic hypoxia and poikilocapnic (no CO2 added) hypoxia during acute (less than 10 min) and sustained (30 min) hypoxia in Denver (1,600 m) with ventilations measured on each of 5 days on Pikes Peak (4,300 m). On Pikes Peak, day 1 ventilation [minute ventilation = 10.0 1/min, BTPS; arterial O2 saturation (Sao2) = 82%] was less than predicted by either acute isocapnic or poikilocapnic tests. However, sustained poikilocapnic hypoxia (Sao2 approximately = 82%) in Denver yielded ventilation similar to that on Pikes Peak on day 1. By Pikes Peak days 4 and 5, endtidal PCO2, pHa, and Sao2 approached plateaus, and ventilation (12.4 1/min, BTPS) on these days was as predicted by the acute isocapnic test. Thus the combination of hypocapnia and sustained hypoxia may have blunted the ventilatory increase on Pikes Peak day 1 but apparently not after 4 or 5 days of acclimatization.